1994
DOI: 10.1109/95.296372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermetallic compounds at aluminum-to-copper electrical interfaces: effect of temperature and electric current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
57
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some DFT theoretical studies have dealt with microstructure alloy phase in surface including metastable precipitates formed during cooling of the alloy, as Guinier-Preston (GP) zones [16,17]. A multiscale approach [18] was applied to model Al 2 Cu-θ phase, and was validated by the comparison with the morphology and microstructural experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some DFT theoretical studies have dealt with microstructure alloy phase in surface including metastable precipitates formed during cooling of the alloy, as Guinier-Preston (GP) zones [16,17]. A multiscale approach [18] was applied to model Al 2 Cu-θ phase, and was validated by the comparison with the morphology and microstructural experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystallized melt had a mix of Al(Cu) and Θ-phase in its composition, while diffusion layer consisted of γ 2 , δ, ζ 2 and η 2 phases. As reported by Braunovic and Alexandrov (1994) and Pfeifer et al (2012), the conductivity of Θ-phase is 12-16 MSm.m −1 (Fig. 7b), so the depth of penetration for the area where Θ-phase is presented is 300-320 µm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The impact and properties of intermetallic compound interlayers have been widely explored in previous studies. The decrease in strength properties as a result of intermetallic formation was reported by Braunovic and Alexandrov (1994); Lee et al (2005); Liu et al (2011);Sheng et al (2011); Kim and Hong (2013); Uscinowicz (2013). Lee et al (2005) have reported the decline of electrical conductivity caused by the emergence of intermetallics in Al/Cu bimetals however in the study of Acarer (2012) no significant decrease in electrical conductivity was observed after the formation of small quantities of CuAl 2 phase between metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…It is evident that the hardness is higher at the interface than on the base metals, which most likely results from the compositional change of the interfacial zone. A greater hardness of IMCs signifies very low mechanical integrity, thus leading to the brittleness of the Cu/Al couples [34]. The observed hardness value first increases and peaks at point 1 located at the IMCs/base material interface.…”
Section: Hardness Of the Cu/al Interfacementioning
confidence: 95%