2003
DOI: 10.1137/s0036139900368893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittency in the Transition to Turbulence

Abstract: Abstract.It is commonly known that the intermittent transition from laminar to turbulent flow in pipes occurs because, at intermediate values of a prescribed pressure drop, a purely laminar flow offers too little resistance, but a fully turbulent one offers too much. We propose a phenomenological model of the flow, which is able to explain this in a quantitative way through a hysteretic transition between laminar and turbulent "states," characterized by a disturbance amplitude variable that satisfies a natural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the flow is occasionally laminar or turbulent (e.g. Wygnaski and Champagne, 1973;Nino and Serio, 2000;Fowler and Howell, 2003). The physical character of this flow may be described by an intermittency factor (c), which represents the fraction of time at which there is turbulent flow.…”
Section: Axial Velocity Measurements In Free Flowing Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the flow is occasionally laminar or turbulent (e.g. Wygnaski and Champagne, 1973;Nino and Serio, 2000;Fowler and Howell, 2003). The physical character of this flow may be described by an intermittency factor (c), which represents the fraction of time at which there is turbulent flow.…”
Section: Axial Velocity Measurements In Free Flowing Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms on the right hand side are the pressure drop contributions from the laminar (∝ 1 − l/L), turbulent (∝ l/L) and external portions of the pipe, respectively. Previous work that split ∆P tot between a laminar and turbulent contribution also predicted oscillations, but they were unable to show quantitative agreement between model and experiment [15,16]. This highlights the importance of accounting for the external resistance R and accurately A single slug is engendered at t = 0 by a perturbation, which grows to its maximum size when it reaches the end of the pipe at t = T .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Rotta's insight laid the foundation for studying the patchy, localized turbulence, now believed to originate from special exact solutions of the governing Navier-Stokes equations such as nonlinear traveling waves [4]. Given the view that intermittency is a natural consequence of the governing equations [5], the PT argument appears irrelevant [11,15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynolds 4 referred to these laminar-turbulent oscillations as "flashes;" later Prandtl and Tietjens 7 identified structures within the flow that they called "puffs" and "slugs," which are unstable turbulent regions in the flow. The nature of these structures remains a topic of advanced study in the field 8,9 . Figure 9 compares the model to the mass flow rates measured from the rounded-entrance tube.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%