1956
DOI: 10.1148/67.5.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent Arteriomesenteric Occlusion of the Duodenum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the general population, the prevalence of superior mesenteric artery syndrome was estimated at around 0.013–0.3% on the basis of upper gastrointestinal barium studies [4, 51, 52], underlining its rarity. Interestingly, the prevalence in a chronic-care hospital (0.965/1,000 admissions) was significantly higher than that in acute general hospitals (0.0108–0.0520/1,000 admissions) [6].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general population, the prevalence of superior mesenteric artery syndrome was estimated at around 0.013–0.3% on the basis of upper gastrointestinal barium studies [4, 51, 52], underlining its rarity. Interestingly, the prevalence in a chronic-care hospital (0.965/1,000 admissions) was significantly higher than that in acute general hospitals (0.0108–0.0520/1,000 admissions) [6].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMA syndrome is an uncommon but distinct clinical condition mostly affecting women between the ages of 10 and 305. There are three predisposing anatomical variants: (1) a sharp angle between the abdominal aorta and the SMA, (2) a short ligament of Treitz with fixation of the duodenum beneath the SMA, and (3) an aberrant SMA situated downwards and forwards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an upper gastrointestinal contrast study the incidence of SMAS was reported to be approximately 0.2%; however, the actual prevalence of SMAS remains unclear (12)(13)(14). To the best of our knowledge, there are only three reports on diabetes complicated by SMAS (14-16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%