2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent CO 2 and viscosity-reducing gas (VRG) injection for enhanced heavy oil recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studying these fluid–fluid interactions is of great interest, due to the complexity of these interactions and their molecular scale, studying them at the lab scale is limited to pore-scale studies, such as micromodel and conventional phase-behavior studies known as the PVT analysis. According to the conducted micromodel studies and PVT analysis, CO 2 –oil interactions lead to reduction in oil viscosity and an increase in oil volume known as oil swelling, which could lead to the production of trapped oil in reservoirs. Several laboratory studies , via using core flooding experiments identified the oil recovery potential of these mechanisms, which highlight their importance on pore-scale displacement efficiency of CO 2 injection. However, all of these lab studies could only identify and discuss the impacts of these interactions on the oil displacement efficiency of CO 2 , and none of them could study these complex interactions at the molecular scale where they first occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studying these fluid–fluid interactions is of great interest, due to the complexity of these interactions and their molecular scale, studying them at the lab scale is limited to pore-scale studies, such as micromodel and conventional phase-behavior studies known as the PVT analysis. According to the conducted micromodel studies and PVT analysis, CO 2 –oil interactions lead to reduction in oil viscosity and an increase in oil volume known as oil swelling, which could lead to the production of trapped oil in reservoirs. Several laboratory studies , via using core flooding experiments identified the oil recovery potential of these mechanisms, which highlight their importance on pore-scale displacement efficiency of CO 2 injection. However, all of these lab studies could only identify and discuss the impacts of these interactions on the oil displacement efficiency of CO 2 , and none of them could study these complex interactions at the molecular scale where they first occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… , In this regard, enhanced oil recovery using CO 2 has become one of the main applications of CCUS, providing safe sites to store CO 2 and an effective way to offset the costs of carbon capture. CO 2 is widely used for the displacement of crude oil from formation, such as gas flooding, huff–puff, and water alternating gas processes. However, the displacement efficiency of CO 2 flooding is too low because of the low viscosity of CO 2. In order to overcome this problem, CO 2 foam flooding is considered a great alternative . The viscosity of CO 2 foam is much higher than that of pure CO 2 gas, and along with the presence of a surfactant, it can effectively enhance oil recovery by reducing the interfacial tension between the oil and water .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9−11 However, the displacement efficiency of CO 2 flooding is too low because of the low viscosity of CO 2. 12 In order to overcome this problem, CO 2 foam flooding is considered a great alternative. 13 The viscosity of CO 2 foam is much higher than that of pure CO 2 gas, and along with the presence of a surfactant, it can effectively enhance oil recovery by reducing the interfacial tension between the oil and water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, the energy needed to produce oil has become inadequate to achieve economically viable scales of production. For this purpose, to improve oil recovery, additional energy is required. The most common secondary recovery techniques are the injection of gas and water. Basically, gas is injected into the gas plug and water is injected into the production area to sweep the oil from the reservoir (Figure ). A pressure maintenance program may begin during the primary recovery stage, but it is an improved form or recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%