If we survey the whole field of antibiotic research as it exists today , we find that these substances are being recovered from an extraordinary variety of sources in the plant kingdom. Apart from fungi and-bacteria, they have been extracted from alga, lichens, toadstools, bananas, sweet potatoes, wallflowers and hops as well as a variety of other plants. On the other hand, few of these thousands of substances qualify as chemotherapeutic agents and these few are derived from three major sources. They are first the higher fungi (Penicillia, Aspergilli) and here it is of some interest that in spite of the examination of many species, of which at least one-third form antibiotics of some kind, none has been found to yield a substance other than penicillin which can approach it in therapeutic efficacy. Another important source is the more primitive group of fungi, Actinomycetes, and these have been found to yield three valuable antibiotics, streptomycin, aureomycin and chloromycetin. Thirdly there are the aerobic sporogenous Bacilli, from which many named antibiotics are derived, the best studied of which are the polymyxins, bacitracin, licheniformin and ayfivin. Although a few enthusiasts dispute this, majority opinion is against the parenteral use of these substances on account of their toxic effect on the kidney. If this conclusion be accepted, we are left only with the antibiotics derived from Actinomycetes to form the subject of this Discussion. Since subsequent speakers are dealing with streptomycin, I shall confine my remarks henceforth to aureomycin and chloromycetin. (For discussion on streptomycin see p. 692). These antibiotics are formed by Streptomyces aureofaciens and Streptomyces venezuele respectively: the latter has also been synthesized, and in its synthetic form SEPT.-MED. 1.