BackgroundThe negative result of a research does not always indicate failure, and when the
data do not permit a proper conclusion, or are contrary to the initial project,
should not simply be discarded and archived.AimTo report failure after performing experimental model of liver ischemia and
reperfusion normothermic, continuous or intermittent, in small animals aiming at
the study of biochemical and histological parameters after postoperative
recovery.MethodsFifteen Wistar rats were divided into three groups of five animals each; all
underwent surgery, the abdomen was sutured after the proposed procedures for each
group and the animals were observed for 6 h or until they died, and then were
reoperated. In Group 1, control (sham-operated): dissection of the hepatic hilum
was performed; in Group 2: clamping of the hepatic hilum for 30 m; in Group 3:
clamping of the hepatic hilum for 15 m, reperfusion for 5 m and another 15 m of
clamping. Data from Groups 2 and 3 were compared with Student's t test.ResultsAll animals of Group 1 survived for 6 h. Two animals in Group 2 died before the 6
h needed to validate the experiment; two did not recover from anesthesia and one
survived until the end. In Group 3, four animals died before the 6 h established
and one of them survived the required time. Only one animal in Group 2 and one in
Group 3 survived and were able to accomplish the study. There was no statistical
significance when the results of Groups 2 and 3 were compared (p>0.05).ConclusionThe death of six animals before the necessary period of observation turned the
initial proposal of the experiment unfeasible.