2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-011-0788-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermolecular electron transfer in two-iron superoxide reductase: a putative role for the desulforedoxin center as an electron donor to the iron active site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the equilibrium structure may be evolutionary optimized for intramolecular electron transfer, which provides an indirect indication for the biological relevance of this mechanism. Consistently, a quasi conserved tyrosine, previously proposed as an electron relay between the two metal sites, 46,47 represents an integral constituent of the identified intramolecular route.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the equilibrium structure may be evolutionary optimized for intramolecular electron transfer, which provides an indirect indication for the biological relevance of this mechanism. Consistently, a quasi conserved tyrosine, previously proposed as an electron relay between the two metal sites, 46,47 represents an integral constituent of the identified intramolecular route.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Electron transfer pathways corresponding to the two subunits are colour-coded, and Fe atoms of centres I and II, depicted as green spheres, are labelled Fe1 and Fe2, respectively. The quasi conserved tyrosine between both metals sites, 43,46,47 Y115 in Dd 2Fe-SOR, is shown in green. C1 and C2 are two points on the C 2 crystallographic axis (not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 3 The 600-nm intermediate in some 1Fe- and 2Fe-SORs undergoes a biphasic decay, which has been attributed to k 3 < k 2 in Scheme I (4, 7, 37). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%