2023
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28237900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermolecular Non-Bonded Interactions from Machine Learning Datasets

Jia-An Chen,
Sheng D. Chao

Abstract: Accurate determination of intermolecular non-covalent-bonded or non-bonded interactions is the key to potentially useful molecular dynamics simulations of polymer systems. However, it is challenging to balance both the accuracy and computational cost in force field modelling. One of the main difficulties is properly representing the calculated energy data as a continuous force function. In this paper, we employ well-developed machine learning techniques to construct a general purpose intermolecular non-bonded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main purpose is to test a recently released ML algorithm called the CLIFF scheme [ 67 ]. In a previous study [ 68 ], we used a lower SAPT level of theory (SAPT0) to calculate the potential energy data and tested the ability of the CLIFF scheme to interpolate the datasets, with an emphasis on the possible overfitting problems. In this present paper, we would like to test the effect of changing the SAPT theory level on the predictive power and determine a minimum level of theory (SAPT2) for approaching the benchmark accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main purpose is to test a recently released ML algorithm called the CLIFF scheme [ 67 ]. In a previous study [ 68 ], we used a lower SAPT level of theory (SAPT0) to calculate the potential energy data and tested the ability of the CLIFF scheme to interpolate the datasets, with an emphasis on the possible overfitting problems. In this present paper, we would like to test the effect of changing the SAPT theory level on the predictive power and determine a minimum level of theory (SAPT2) for approaching the benchmark accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%