2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02716.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermonomer flexibility of Ca‐ and Mg‐actin filaments at different pH values

Abstract: The¯uorescence resonance energy transfer parameter, f, is de®ned as the e ciency of the energy transfer normalized by the quantum yield of the donor in the presence of acceptor. It is possible to characterize the¯exibility of the protein matrix between the appropriate¯uorescent probes by monitoring the temperature dependence of f. The intermonomer¯exi-bility of the Ca-actin and Mg-actin ®laments was characterized by using this method at pH values of 6.5 and 7.4. The protomers were labeled on Cys374 with donor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All values were obtained after single exponential fit. The measured τ and τ r for IAEDANS and IAF are within limits and similar values have been reported earlier [52]. The orientation factor, κ 2 was assumed to be 0.476 as the rotational correlation time (τ r ) for both donor and acceptor is more than their lifetime (τ) and therefore, the probe is not an isotropic rotor during the lifetime of the excited state [38][39][40].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All values were obtained after single exponential fit. The measured τ and τ r for IAEDANS and IAF are within limits and similar values have been reported earlier [52]. The orientation factor, κ 2 was assumed to be 0.476 as the rotational correlation time (τ r ) for both donor and acceptor is more than their lifetime (τ) and therefore, the probe is not an isotropic rotor during the lifetime of the excited state [38][39][40].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was also proved by fluorescence spectroscopy and EPR measurements that the C-terminal part of the monomer became more rigid when the bound calcium is replaced by magnesium [Nyitrai et al, 1997]. The effects of cations are highly influenced by the environmental pH [Hild et al, 2002] that can intracellularly change under physiological (e.g., fatigue) and pathological (e.g., ischemia) conditions [Mohabir et al, 1991; Thompson et al, 1992]. The interprotomer flexibility of Mg 2+ -F-actin was found to be lower than that of Ca 2+ -F-actin in the range between pH 6.5 and pH 7.4 [Hild et al, 2002], while there was no such pH induced difference in the case of Ca 2+ -F-actin.…”
Section: Self-assembly Of Actin and Its Interactions With Nucleotidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of cations are highly influenced by the environmental pH [Hild et al, 2002] that can intracellularly change under physiological (e.g., fatigue) and pathological (e.g., ischemia) conditions [Mohabir et al, 1991; Thompson et al, 1992]. The interprotomer flexibility of Mg 2+ -F-actin was found to be lower than that of Ca 2+ -F-actin in the range between pH 6.5 and pH 7.4 [Hild et al, 2002], while there was no such pH induced difference in the case of Ca 2+ -F-actin. The interprotomer connections were more rigid at both pH 6.5 and 7.4 in Mg 2+ -F-actin than in Ca 2+ -F-actin [Hild et al, 2002].…”
Section: Self-assembly Of Actin and Its Interactions With Nucleotidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actin was labeled with fluorescent probes (IAEDANS (on Cys 374 ), IAF (Cys 374 ) or FC (Gln 41 )) as described previously [8][9][10]. The labeling ratios (the ratio of the probe concentration to the actin concentration) for IAEDANS, IAF and FC were 0.9, 0.6 and 0.6, respectively.…”
Section: Protein Preparation and Fluorescent Labeling Of The Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%