2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000921000775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal and external factors contributing to variability in consonant accuracy of Arabic–French simultaneous bilingual children

Abstract: This study aims to describe the relationships between child-internal and child-external factors and the consonant accuracy of bilingual children. More specifically, the study looks at internal factors: expressive and receptive vocabulary, and external factors: language exposure and language status, of a group of 4-year-old bilingual Arabic–French children. We measured the consonant accuracy of the children by the percentage of correct consonants in a Picture-Naming Task and a Non-Word Repetition Task in each l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, we documented similar PCCs regardless of sampling methods. This finding is in agreement with several studies that show similar phonological abilities when children are tested via a language sample versus a single-word naming task (Masterson, Bernhardt, & Hofheinz, 2005;Morrison & Shriberg, 1992) and a single-word naming task versus a NWR task (Meziane & MacLeod, 2021). Nevertheless, the measures based on the NWR and the single-word naming task appeared to correlate best with vocabulary size and were the ones that emerged as significant in our statistical models, indicating that these measures tapped phonological processing skills more relevant to vocabulary development than the language sample.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Overall, we documented similar PCCs regardless of sampling methods. This finding is in agreement with several studies that show similar phonological abilities when children are tested via a language sample versus a single-word naming task (Masterson, Bernhardt, & Hofheinz, 2005;Morrison & Shriberg, 1992) and a single-word naming task versus a NWR task (Meziane & MacLeod, 2021). Nevertheless, the measures based on the NWR and the single-word naming task appeared to correlate best with vocabulary size and were the ones that emerged as significant in our statistical models, indicating that these measures tapped phonological processing skills more relevant to vocabulary development than the language sample.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 93%