“…After exclusion of patients as described in the Methods section, the 44 studies consisted of 3,457 patients (range 7–714 per study; 2,902 patients with extracranial ICA occlusion, 224 with intracranial ICA stenosis or occlusion, 293 patients with stenosis or occlusion of the MCA, whereas in 38 patients the location of the arterial lesion was not specified), with 12,457 patient-years of follow-up (range 10–3,320 per study). Fifteen studies had a prospective design [1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]and 29 were retrospective [3, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. Thirty-four studies included patients only if the carotid or MCA lesion had been demonstrated by angiography, whereas in 8 studies the carotid lesion could also be demonstrated by duplex [4, 6, 17, 18, 41, 43, 46, 48]or magnetic resonance angiography [4].…”