“…1 Various terms have been used to describe near-occlusion, which can mislead students or those doing literature searches: near-occlusion (or "near total occlusion" [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] ), pseudo-occlusion, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]43,45,47,48,50-70 string sign, 1-5,7,9-13,16,18-20,22,24,26,30, 11,12,18,45 99% stenosis, 66 hairline residual lumen, 20,43 and incomplete occlusion. 1 Calculating percentage stenosis for carotid near-occlusion is fallacious, and near-occlusion assessment is advised before measuring for percentage stenosis.…”