2019
DOI: 10.26444/aaem/91783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal consistency and accuracy of Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL-40) in mothers of healthy children and those with a medical history

Abstract: Introduction and objective. The aim of the study was assessment of the internal consistency and accuracy of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-40 v. GP (ISEL-40 v. GP) in a group of mothers of healthy children and in a group of mothers of children with a medical history, and presentation of the initial research results. Materials and method. A group of 230 mothers were involved in the research: 57 mothers of healthy children, 26 mothers of infants with a perinatal medical history, as well as 147 mothers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ISEL is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates general support received from a broader network, including friends and family 56. Reliability for the ISEL has been demonstrated in a cohort of mothers from a general population, with alpha (a=0.8657).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISEL is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates general support received from a broader network, including friends and family 56. Reliability for the ISEL has been demonstrated in a cohort of mothers from a general population, with alpha (a=0.8657).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is designed to estimate the potential possibility of gaining social support as envisaged by the respondents. The original version of ISEL 40 v. GP has 4 10-item subscales: tangible support, appraisal support, self-esteem support, and belonging support [ 51 , 52 , 53 ]. Due to the nature of the research and the low internal consistency of the subscales in the study group, it was decided to use only the total score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subscale consists of 10 items such as, "I often meet and talk with family or friends". The ISEL has demonstrated high test reliability overall (α=0.86; Aftyka et al, 2019), but the internal consistency for each subscale varies and so they are not recommended for individual analyses.…”
Section: Unsituated Individual Difference Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%