2023
DOI: 10.3390/f14050978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Decay in Landscape Oaks (Quercus spp.): Incidence, Severity, Explanatory Variables, and Estimates of Strength Loss

Abstract: As trees age, internal decay and the risk of stem failure become important management issues for arborists. To characterize the incidence and severity of internal decay in landscape oaks, 323 pairs of sonic and electrical resistance tomograms were generated from 186 trees, representing five species: Q. alba, Q. bicolor, Q. palustris, Q. rubra, and Q. velutina. Overall, 135 (73%) oaks had detectable decay. When intermediate sonic velocities were included, the mean area of decay (AD) was 41% with a mean strength… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although desirable to increase the accuracy of the estimate, it is clear that weighing the contribution of tomographic pixels to the load-bearing capacity with the stress wave velocity, as described by [19], would not be justified. Another point of debate is the best color threshold to use to discriminate between intact wood and decay or cavities [36,37]. Based on our experience, we decided not to include green areas in the decay/cavity category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although desirable to increase the accuracy of the estimate, it is clear that weighing the contribution of tomographic pixels to the load-bearing capacity with the stress wave velocity, as described by [19], would not be justified. Another point of debate is the best color threshold to use to discriminate between intact wood and decay or cavities [36,37]. Based on our experience, we decided not to include green areas in the decay/cavity category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%