1992
DOI: 10.1021/ja00031a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal H-C-C angle dependence of vicinal 1H-1H coupling constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the coefficient of cos $ is not required to be negative by theory because it is the difference between large terms of opposite signs (16). In fact, for the latest formulating of 3~(~,~) , which takes CCH angles into consideration (16,17), the B term is 0.3 Hz for tetrahedral angles and hence JI8, < JO in the ideal case. Third, the exact values of $ for 1 above are not to be taken too literally; it does appear, however, that $, , > $ , , > $, , .…”
Section: The Pucker Of the Dithiane Tnoietymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the coefficient of cos $ is not required to be negative by theory because it is the difference between large terms of opposite signs (16). In fact, for the latest formulating of 3~(~,~) , which takes CCH angles into consideration (16,17), the B term is 0.3 Hz for tetrahedral angles and hence JI8, < JO in the ideal case. Third, the exact values of $ for 1 above are not to be taken too literally; it does appear, however, that $, , > $ , , > $, , .…”
Section: The Pucker Of the Dithiane Tnoietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vicinal coupling constant, 3~(~,~) , is sensitive to the dihedral angle, +, between the protons (14, 15), but also depends on the CCH angles, the s character of the hybrid orbitals at the two carbon atoms in the HCCH fragment, on various overlap integrals, themselves dependent on the C-C distance, and on the effective nuclear charges at the carbon atoms (16,17). It follows that substituents, X, at carbon will also perturb 3~(~,~) , a perturbation whose magnitude may well depend on the dihedral angle between the C-X and the vicinal C-H bonds.…”
Section: The Pucker Of the Dithiane Tnoietymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because HTOs can be written in terms of internal and dihedral angles, it is often possible to relate the matrix elements and, therefore, coupling constants to angles and internuclear separations. Such models have been used in these laboratories to obtain explicit expressions in terms of the structural factors such as the H-C-C internal angle dependence of 3 J H,H 0 ; 32 the dependence of long range coupling 4 J H,H 0 over four bonds on dihedral angle and internal angles; 33 and the relationships of trans H-bonding J-coupling to H-bond geometries in nucleic acids and proteins. 28,29 In the next sections, an LCAO-MO/SOS analysis will be used to examine the structural dependencies of 2 J H,H 0 in a CH 2 moiety, Figure 1.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fc Terms Via a Lcao-mo Sum-over-states Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus conceivable that for spatially proximate bonds all of the off-diagonal elements in the numerator of Eqn (4) could be large, whereas hh 0 and J HH 0 in Eqn (1) could be very small! To examine the conformational dependence of Jcoupling, it is often convenient to write the hybrid orbitals t and t 0 in terms of the dihedral and internal angles 37,38 t…”
Section: Analysis Of Fc Coupling In Ch· · ·Oh and Oh· · ·Oh Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%