2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02631.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal jugular vein diameter in pediatric patients: are the J‐shaped guidewire diameters bigger than internal jugular vein? An evaluation with ultrasound

Abstract: The diameter of the IJV in pediatric patients, especially infants, is often smaller than the diameter of the J-tip guidewire curve. We speculate that this may lead to impeded guidewires and failed cannulation. It must also be kept in mind that the Trendelenberg position might not facilitate IJV cannulation in children <2 years of age.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the diameter of central venous vessels, it was demonstrated in pediatric patients (1 month and older) (Sayin et al,2008), and also confirmed by our study, that the diameter of the internal jugular vein is smaller than the diameter of the J‐tip guidewire curve. The J‐tip of the guidewire of a 4‐F catheterization kit has a diameter of 5.0 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Regarding the diameter of central venous vessels, it was demonstrated in pediatric patients (1 month and older) (Sayin et al,2008), and also confirmed by our study, that the diameter of the internal jugular vein is smaller than the diameter of the J‐tip guidewire curve. The J‐tip of the guidewire of a 4‐F catheterization kit has a diameter of 5.0 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In order to avoid the risk of venous thrombosis, this panel suggests that the external diameter of the catheter should not exceed 1/3 of the internal diameter of the vein. Similar measurements can avoid the insertion of a J-wire guide that is larger than the vessel [58]. Further research is required to compare both the mechanical and infectious complications for different access sites in neonates and children.…”
Section: Integration In Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of LM technique to insert CVA requires multiple trials maneuver can lead to hematoma formation that might induce changes in IJV or might even cause external compression, which makes its access more difficult even when US locations is used as rescue techniques [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small diameter of IJV in low birth weight neonates to the age and the weight makes its success more difficult than in adults. The smaller dimensions of the IJV in infants increase the number of attempts, favor the changes in puncture points and the depth of needle insertion, and finally increase the risks of complications including carotid artery injury or pneumothorax [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%