2009
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal standard-based analysis of microarray data. Part 1: analysis of differential gene expressions

Abstract: Genome-scale microarray experiments for comparative analysis of gene expressions produce massive amounts of information. Traditional statistical approaches fail to achieve the required accuracy in sensitivity and specificity of the analysis. Since the problem can be resolved neither by increasing the number of replicates nor by manipulating thresholds, one needs a novel approach to the analysis. This article describes methods to improve the power of microarray analyses by defining internal standards to charact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BMDCs were stimulated with LPS or poly(I:C) for 3 h. RNA was extracted by using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen). Methods for data normalization and analysis are based on the use of "internal standards" (35)(36)(37), which was slightly modified to the needs of RNA sequencing data analysis. Functional analysis of identified genes was performed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMDCs were stimulated with LPS or poly(I:C) for 3 h. RNA was extracted by using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen). Methods for data normalization and analysis are based on the use of "internal standards" (35)(36)(37), which was slightly modified to the needs of RNA sequencing data analysis. Functional analysis of identified genes was performed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for data normalization and analysis are based on the use of "internal standards" 61 that characterize some aspects of the system's behavior, such as technical variability, as presented elsewhere 62,63 . Genes with log 2 (fold change) > 2, P < 0.05 and RPKM > 0.5 were deemed to be significantly differentially expressed between the two conditions, and used for pathway analysis and upstream transcription factor analysis.…”
Section: Competing Financial Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative level of methylation for each CG site was calculated as the ratio of methylated-probe signal to total locus signal intensity and defined within 0 to 1 range, exported from the Illumina BeadStudio software package. The data were then normalized as described previously, 22,23 using the variability of areas with low methylation level as a reference point. In order to find genes with methylation levels above the level of technical noise, a frequency histogram of raw methylation signal was determined for each array.…”
Section: ©2 0 1 1 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods and analyses were performed in Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA), unless otherwise specified. To identify differentially methylated CG sites between lupus patients and controls, we used the associative analysis as described by Dozmorov et al 23 CG sites with methylation signal greater than 6 SD above noise level and have at least 1.2-fold difference Table 5. Main functional annotations overrepresented by protein-protein interaction network (shown in Fig.…”
Section: O N O T D I S T R I B U T Ementioning
confidence: 99%