1 concluded that silver-coated endotracheal tubes reduced the incidence of ventilatorassociated pneumonia (VAP) by 36% compared with uncoated tubes. The evidence they present, however, is more suggestive of an effect on endobronchial colonization than on clinically meaningful invasive disease.First, the authors defined VAP as 10 4 colony-forming units/mL or greater on quantitative culture of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Although this definition has the advantage of being objective, it does not necessarily translate into histological VAP or clinically important disease. 2 The reported sensitivity of quantitative BAL culture is only 50% to 77% and the specificity is 58% to 95% relative to autopsy-confirmed VAP. 3,4 Second, 28 of 93 positive BALs (30%) yielded organisms that are typically considered nonpathogenic colonizers. These included coagulase-negative staphylococci, enterococci, yeast, and normal flora. Excluding these nonpathogenic organisms, 28 of 968 patients (2.9%) in the silver-coated endotracheal tube group developed VAP vs 37 of 964 patients (3.8%) in the uncoated endotracheal group. This difference is not statistically significant (P = .26 by Fisher exact test, SAS version 9.1; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). Limiting the analysis to patients ventilated for more than 24 hours yields a similar result (3.7% vs 5.0%; P=.25).Third, although the study was not specifically powered to assess differences in clinical outcomes, with 2003 enrolled patients nonstatistically significant but clinically meaningful differences might have been expected. However, there were no differences between patients receiving silvercoated and uncoated tubes in the proportion that aroused physician suspicion for VAP (26% vs 31%; P = .39) or who met a clinical definition of VAP (presence of radiographic infiltrate and Ն2 of abnormal white blood cell count, abnormal temperature, or purulent secretions; 53% vs 56%; P =.74). There were no differences in the important clinical parameters of duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay in hospital, or mortality.Introducing silver-coated endotracheal tubes into practice should require evidence of a clinically meaningful effect on patient outcomes. Consideration should also be given to the magnitude of the benefit, the kinds of patients who stand to benefit, and the cost of achieving benefit in comparison with other interventions. The NASCENT trial demonstrated that silver coating reduces colonization of the lower airway and therefore merits additional evaluation but does not provide evidence that silver coating benefits patients.