2015
DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2014.957989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Actions Against IUU Fishing and the Adoption of National Plans of Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many fishing and coastal states are party to key UN and FAO Fishing Agreements (see above) and those states which are serious about reducing illegal fishing activities often encourage their neighbouring states to similarly adopt and enforce the instruments of the fisheries capture legal regime (Kao, 2015). States can also be party Australian legal toothfish operators have been a large part of this success through their involvement in the Coalition of Legal Toothfish Operators (COLTO -see above) and are also recognized as "world leaders in sustainable harvesting" (Haward & Bergin, 2016 Islands (2007).…”
Section: Fisheries In High Seas Jurisdictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many fishing and coastal states are party to key UN and FAO Fishing Agreements (see above) and those states which are serious about reducing illegal fishing activities often encourage their neighbouring states to similarly adopt and enforce the instruments of the fisheries capture legal regime (Kao, 2015). States can also be party Australian legal toothfish operators have been a large part of this success through their involvement in the Coalition of Legal Toothfish Operators (COLTO -see above) and are also recognized as "world leaders in sustainable harvesting" (Haward & Bergin, 2016 Islands (2007).…”
Section: Fisheries In High Seas Jurisdictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many fishing and coastal states are party to key UN and FAO Fishing Agreements (see above) and those states which are serious about reducing illegal fishing activities often encourage their neighbouring states to similarly adopt and enforce the instruments of the fisheries capture legal regime (Kao, 2015). States can also be party to bilateral fishing agreements, RFMOs and other fisheries forums that seek to address IUU fishing.…”
Section: Illegal Fishing In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Model Scheme, similar to the IPOA-IUU, is a "soft law" in nature [24]. In addition to the "Introduction", it includes five additional sections, namely "General", "Inspections", "Actions", "Information" and "Others," along with five annexes [23].…”
Section: Iuu Fishing and International Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous local and international regulations have been considered for combating illegal fishing activities (Kao, ; Leroy, Galletti, & Chaboud, ; Miller, Bush, & Mol, ; Pramod, Nakamura, Pitcher, & Delagran, ). Implementing these regulations still faces certain challenges, as despite the Caspian littoral states banning the harvesting of sturgeon, non‐compliance with rules by a large number of fishers takes place and IUU fishing has been reported as one of the main causes of sturgeon decline (Lagutov & Lagutov, ; van Uhm & Siegel, ; Ye & Valbo‐Jørgensen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%