2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
335
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(357 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
17
335
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Type II error, or commission, is the number of trees falsely extracted [36]. In accordance with the TLS benchmarking project [49], the accuracy of tree extraction was assessed by the completeness, correctness, and mean accuracy of detection. The completeness is defined by the percentage of the extracted trees in the field.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type II error, or commission, is the number of trees falsely extracted [36]. In accordance with the TLS benchmarking project [49], the accuracy of tree extraction was assessed by the completeness, correctness, and mean accuracy of detection. The completeness is defined by the percentage of the extracted trees in the field.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the sample plot level, TLS point clouds were co-registered with a mean distance error of 2.9 mm and standard deviation 1.2 mm, mean horizontal error was 1.3 mm (standard deviation 0.4 mm) and mean vertical error 2.3 mm (standard deviation 1.2 mm) (Saarinen et al 2020) indicating high geometric accuracy of the point clouds. When similarly collected point clouds have been used to automatically measure tree diameters at multiple heights along a stem, root mean square error less than 1 cm can be expected in boreal forest conditions (Liang et al 2018).…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the use of a focused short‐wavelength laser pulse, TLS has a strong capability to penetrate forest canopy and collect high‐fidelity three‐dimensional data of trees in the form of point cloud (Calders et al, ). Numerous studies have proven that TLS is an objective, accurate, and efficient method to extract trunk traits (e.g., tree height and DBH) (Calders et al, ; Li et al, ; Liang et al, ; Liang et al, ; Luo et al, ; Vicari et al, ; Wang et al, ). With the assistance of individual tree segmentation and stem‐leaf segmentation algorithms, detailed crown architecture traits are also becoming possible to acquire in a repeatable and accurate way (Disney, ; Jin, Su, Gao, et al, ; Jin, Su, Wu, et al, ; Li et al, ; Li et al, ; Moorthy et al, ; Tao, Guo, et al, ; Tao, Wu, et al, ), which provides a new tool to observe changes in tree architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%