1993
DOI: 10.3386/w4534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Capital Mobility in the 1990s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, barriers to international capital flows have declined significantly over time and have been accompanied by widespread deregulation of financial markets and dramatic advances in information and communication technology-factors that have operated to increase international capital mobility (Feldstein and Bacchetta, 1991;Coakley, Kulasi and Smith, 1998). Finally, the empirical evidence is generally consistent with perfect capital mobility in the sense that interest rates on deposits of the same maturity and risk characteristics and expressed in the same national currency tend to be equalized (Frankel, 1993;Obstfeld, 1995). However, Obstfeld (1995) also notes that little has been learned about international capital mobility from cross-country comparisons of rates of return on assets in different currencies, as such returns incorporate expected changes in exchange rates as well as an exchange-rate risk premium, and that the empirical evidence in general does not support uncovered interest rate parity under these circumstances (Frankel, 1993;Smallwood and Norrbin, 2008).…”
Section: Capital Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, barriers to international capital flows have declined significantly over time and have been accompanied by widespread deregulation of financial markets and dramatic advances in information and communication technology-factors that have operated to increase international capital mobility (Feldstein and Bacchetta, 1991;Coakley, Kulasi and Smith, 1998). Finally, the empirical evidence is generally consistent with perfect capital mobility in the sense that interest rates on deposits of the same maturity and risk characteristics and expressed in the same national currency tend to be equalized (Frankel, 1993;Obstfeld, 1995). However, Obstfeld (1995) also notes that little has been learned about international capital mobility from cross-country comparisons of rates of return on assets in different currencies, as such returns incorporate expected changes in exchange rates as well as an exchange-rate risk premium, and that the empirical evidence in general does not support uncovered interest rate parity under these circumstances (Frankel, 1993;Smallwood and Norrbin, 2008).…”
Section: Capital Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Finally, the empirical evidence is generally consistent with perfect capital mobility in the sense that interest rates on deposits of the same maturity and risk characteristics and expressed in the same national currency tend to be equalized (Frankel, 1993;Obstfeld, 1995). However, Obstfeld (1995) also notes that little has been learned about international capital mobility from cross-country comparisons of rates of return on assets in different currencies, as such returns incorporate expected changes in exchange rates as well as an exchange-rate risk premium, and that the empirical evidence in general does not support uncovered interest rate parity under these circumstances (Frankel, 1993;Smallwood and Norrbin, 2008). The implications of these empirical results are discussed in more detail below.…”
Section: Capital Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Por ello, se convirtió en uno de los enigmas o "puzles" más debatidos en economía internacional (Obstfeld y Rogoff, 2000) e impulsó una línea de investigación que aún se mantiene activa. Los trabajos de Tesar (1991), Obstfeld (1993), Coakley et al (1998) Las reacciones a la conclusión "fuerte" de F-H podrían resumirse en dos líneas de trabajo diferentes. Por un lado, un grupo de autores negaron que ␤ pudiera considerarse una medida válida de la movilidad internacional del capital.…”
Section: El Enfoque De Feldstein Y Horioka: ¿Qué Mide ␤?unclassified
“…1971-1975OLS 1976-19801981-1985Thomas (1993) UK Panel 1971-1987Canadá Panel 1961-1989Yamori (1995) Japón OLS 1970-1974Media período 1975-19791980-1985Dekle (1996) Japón OLS 1975-1988Media período 1975-19791980-19841985-1988 Iwamoto y Van Wincoop (2000) Japón OLS. Media período 1975-19801980-19851985-1990Series temporales 1975-1990Hellyiwell y Mckitrick (1999) Canadá OLS 1961-1993Media período 1961-19711983-1993 Van Wincoop (2000) Japón Panel 1970-1990…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified