International comparison of the changing dynamics of governance approaches to land development and their results for public value capture

Developing an optimal pattern for state intervention in urban land management: case of Iran, Tehran city

“…There are two major approaches to land administration: public governance and private governance (also called 'active' and 'passive' approaches). The suitable approach to each issue depends on institutional, financial and environmental factors and may change with time [32]. Governments can play both a passive regulatory role through public planning (being the 'referee') and an active role through public land ownership (being a 'player') [33].…”

Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland

“…There are many different approaches to land development (Muñoz Gielen et al, 2017;Needham and Verhage, 1998;van der Krabben and Jacobs, 2013). The classifications of land development approaches differ to some extent depending on the purpose of the classification.…”

“…In the other approaches one or more of these activities are to some extent within 2 the responsibility of private developers (see, e.g. Muñoz Gielen et al, 2017;Needham and Verhage, 1998;van der Krabben and Jacobs, 2013).…”

“…When the intervention occurs via locationally specific (instead of generic) regulation following public law, it is generally un-derstood as land use planning (Needham, 2006, p. 20). The land development approaches offer different avenues for further intervention that rely, to a different extent, on statutory public law rules or voluntary private law agreements (Muñoz Gielen et al, 2017). Hartmann and Spit (2015) derive, based on DeRidder and Schut (1995), Needham (2007Needham ( , 2014, Spit and Zoete (2009) and VROM (2002), four essential objectives for spatial land use planning and related land management, which can be combined with a term land policy (see Gerber et al, 2018, pp.…”

“…Thus, private law voluntary agreements are needed to achieve these uses. Albeit other land development approaches can involve private law agreements as well, the negotiation position of the public authority is different in public land development (Muñoz Gielen et al, 2017;Samsura et al, 2010). If the public land development approach can promote the achievement of such desired uses that cannot be regulated via land use planning, it contributes to the output-legitimation of the approach.…”