1995
DOI: 10.1016/1062-1458(96)81080-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International comparison of waiting times for selected cardiovascular procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While waiting times of less than three months have been quoted for hospitals in the United States, the average waiting time for elective CABG is well over three months in Canada (14). Patients often wait in hospital after an MI for several weeks before they are allotted a date for CABG because of these backlogs, resulting in increased costs related to hospital stay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While waiting times of less than three months have been quoted for hospitals in the United States, the average waiting time for elective CABG is well over three months in Canada (14). Patients often wait in hospital after an MI for several weeks before they are allotted a date for CABG because of these backlogs, resulting in increased costs related to hospital stay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En Chile podemos distinguir los siguientes sistemas de prestaciones de salud: el sistema nacional de servicios de salud, las clínicas privadas, el sistema universitario con sus dos hospitales clínicos y consultorios, el de las FFAA y sus hospitales y por último, las mutuales de seguridad y sus hospitales 19 . Sabemos que los sistemas privados seleccionan por capacidad de pago y que los sistemas públicos presentan falencias de especialistas e infraestructura para atender la demanda de patologías complejas [4][5][6][7][8]20 . Esto permite plantear que al utilizar en forma complementaria los recursos de salud existentes en el país, se podrían beneficiar todos los que lo necesitan, independientemente de su condición socio económica, ya que existe capacidad no utilizada en el sector universitario y privado nacional.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Esto permite plantear que al utilizar en forma complementaria los recursos de salud existentes en el país, se podrían beneficiar todos los que lo necesitan, independientemente de su condición socio económica, ya que existe capacidad no utilizada en el sector universitario y privado nacional. La colaboración entre los disrev Med chile 2013; 141: 861-869 tintos sistemas de prestaciones de salud puede así contribuir a reducir la inequidad en salud, meta prioritaria del gobierno de Chile, que ha mostrado avances, pero necesita progresar con mayor celeridad, al igual que en otros países 7,8,20,21 . Una vez que el paciente del sistema público fue referido a nuestro servicio para su intervención, este fue operado prontamente sin diferencia con los pacientes del sistema universitario y de seguros privados, aprovechando nuestras ventajas organizacionales y de infraestructura.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…It was found that 5% of patients had been waiting for at least 4 months in the United States, as opposed to 23% in Australia, 26% in New Zealand, 27% in Canada and 38% in the United Kingdom. Carroll et al (1995) found that the percentage of the respondents in need of elective coronary bypass who had been waiting for more than three months was 0% in U.S., 18.2% in Sweden, 46.7% in Canada, and 88.9% in the United Kingdom. Similarly, Coyte et al (1994) found that surveyed patients in need of knee replacement had a median waiting time of three weeks in the United States and eight weeks in Canada (Ontario).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 summarises the information contained in three further surveys. Carroll et al (1995) focused on waiting times for cardiovascular procedures in four countries. It found that the percentage of the respondents in need of elective coronary bypass who had been waiting for more than three months was 88.9% in the United Kingdom, 46.7% in Canada, 18.2% in Sweden and 0% in the U.S. For elective coronary angiography the percentage was 22.8% in the United Kingdom, 16.1% in Canada, 15.4% in Sweden and 0% in the U.S.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%