International Competition Intensified: Job Satisfaction Sacrificed?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Zusammenfassung / AbstractThere has been an intense debate as to the effects of offshoring and global value chains on labor, with the debate centering around possible negative employment and income effects for the low(er) skilled in advanced economies. Although sociological and psychological research has shown that income falls far too short when it comes to subjective well-being (SWB), the globalization's impact on SWB has been surprisingly under-researched. This applies in particular to job satisfaction, including of those negatively affected by seeing their real income depressed. Against this backdrop, we develop a trade model that is capable of capturing job satisfaction in conjunction with the income and distributional effects of offshoring. Contrary to a great many beliefs, our theoretical considerations suggest that those remaining employed may be more satisfied with their jobs, even if suffering from increased competition and from more tasks being offshored. Running a cross-section logistic regression model that combines information on offshoring and job satisfaction, lends support to our theoretical explanations. Accordingly, job satisfaction is on average rated higher in countries with comparatively high offshoring activities. More disaggregated regressions get to the heart of the matter, which is a change in the characteristics of the remaining jobs. Our results stand up to extensive robustness checks with respect to different specifications, measures of globalization, and even when controlling for many of the usually suspected variables with reference to SWB.JEL-Klassifikation / JEL-Classification: F66, I31

Construction of Model to Enhance College Students’ Core Competitiveness from Perspective of Employment Competition through IoT Apps

“…According to the statistical data, although the demand in the labor market is slightly greater than the supply, the problem of difficult employment still exists in the whole society, which is caused by the structural contradiction of employment [7][8][9]. At present, China's economy is transforming from external scale expansion to internal structure adjustment, and the adjustment of economic structure will inevitably bring about changes in labor demand [10].…”

Küreselleşme Yaşam Tatminini Nasıl Açıklar?

“…Results show that trade freedom increases happiness while trade to GDP ratio decreases it for low income economies. Dluhosch and Horgos (2019) examine the effects of several international trade measures and offshoring activities on job satisfaction of individuals. The estimated effects differ with respect to the measure used.…”

Are we happy with our work in globalization? Globalization experience, achievement motivation, and job seniority as predictors of work satisfaction in a group of office workers

“…There are numerous sociological and philosophical deliberations about the impact of globalization on our lives and work [ 1 – 5 ], yet relatively few empirical studies have considered this topic to date from a psychological individualistic perspective [ 6 – 9 ]. Many of them suggest a negative impact, for example, globalization is correlated with exhaustion in the work environment [ 10 ] and may be the cause of increased stress or a permanent need to be on standby [ 11 ]. There is, however, still a problem with the psychological approach to globalization because of the lack of tools to measure how people experience it.…”

“…There is, however, still a problem with the psychological approach to globalization because of the lack of tools to measure how people experience it. Some methods that have been used include questions about friends abroad and travels [ 7 ], trade policy and flow [ 11 ], and watching international TV channels [ 12 ]. In this study, we used the Globalization Experience Model (GME) [ 13 ], which describes affective and cognitive experiences of globalization processes on self-realization, security, and sense of agency, to test whether individual exposure to globalization predicts work satisfaction.…”