2007
DOI: 10.1126/science.1146002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Conservation Policy Delivers Benefits for Birds in Europe

Abstract: Conservation of the planet's biodiversity will depend on international policy intervention, yet evidence-based assessment of the success of such intervention is lacking. Poor understanding of the effectiveness of international policy instruments exposes them to criticism or abandonment and reduces opportunities to improve them. Comparative analyses of population trends provide strong evidence for a positive impact of one such instrument, the European Union's Birds Directive, and we identify positive associatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
218
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
218
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, international law would seem to be a useful, and probably indispensable, ingredient of the larger toolbox needed to adequately conserve large carnivores. It is probably fair to assume-although it is difficult to conclusively prove or disprove this-that without it the conservation status of quite a few species worldwide would have been worse (Donald et al 2007;Baakman 2011). To illustrate, in many countries protected areas have been designated, or existing protected areas reinforced, pursuant to international obligations under wildlife treaties (Bowman et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, international law would seem to be a useful, and probably indispensable, ingredient of the larger toolbox needed to adequately conserve large carnivores. It is probably fair to assume-although it is difficult to conclusively prove or disprove this-that without it the conservation status of quite a few species worldwide would have been worse (Donald et al 2007;Baakman 2011). To illustrate, in many countries protected areas have been designated, or existing protected areas reinforced, pursuant to international obligations under wildlife treaties (Bowman et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is some evidence that present pan-European conservation policy may be helping birds (Donald et al 2007) and it is hoped that the recent European Strategy for the conservation of invertebrates (Haslett 2007) and the newly revised Strategy for plants (Planta Europa 2008) may similarly help these organisms, we need overall strategies and policies that have new ''on the ground'' flexibility to deal with such dynamic systems. Also, if conservation policies were already delivering sufficiently to attain their targets, and if their importance was accepted by other sectors, there would not be a need to develop strategies and policies that refer explicitly to (dynamic) ecosystem services.…”
Section: Amending Existing Strategies/policy and Adding New Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitating range expansion, therefore, has the potential to become one of the most effective conservation strategies that can be deployed to minimize climatic and other risks to species [3,4]. However, such strategies still lack robust empirical underpinning: there is limited evidence of the effectiveness of static protected areas (PAs) to protect species per se ( [5][6][7] but see [8]), let alone if species distributions become more dynamic [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%