2009
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International consultation on urological diseases: Evidence‐based medicine overview of the main steps for developing and grading guideline recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of this Consultation was to use established criteria to assign objective levels of evidence (LOEs, 1 through 4) and grades of recommendation (GORs, A through D) to the most salient research in the field. 3 The purpose of this review is to present a condensed summary of the ICUD-SIU evaluation of nocturia, incorporating additional subsequent panel review of the evidence base, which offers contemporaneous expert consensus on this topic. LOEs and GORs are presented here as the verbatim conclusions of the ICUD-SIU panel, with more detailed descriptions published elsewhere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this Consultation was to use established criteria to assign objective levels of evidence (LOEs, 1 through 4) and grades of recommendation (GORs, A through D) to the most salient research in the field. 3 The purpose of this review is to present a condensed summary of the ICUD-SIU evaluation of nocturia, incorporating additional subsequent panel review of the evidence base, which offers contemporaneous expert consensus on this topic. LOEs and GORs are presented here as the verbatim conclusions of the ICUD-SIU panel, with more detailed descriptions published elsewhere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each article considered eligible after screening was reviewed (full text) by two investigators. All articles confirmed eligible were assigned a level of evidence by both reviewers, using a system based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Level of Evidence scale (2009 version) and International Consultation on Urological Diseases, modified to include cross-sectional studies as level 4b evidence (Table 2) 7, 8 . If initial grades differed, investigators arrived at a grade by consensus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings were presented at the annual scientific meeting of the European Association of Urology in 2012 for consultation, and modifications applied for the fifth edition of the ICI scientific report in 2013 . Levels of evidence (LOE) and grades of recommendation (GOR) were derived according to the modified Oxford system developed by the International Consultations on Urological Diseases …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%