Science Diplomacy : Science, Antarctica, and the Governance of International Spaces 2011
DOI: 10.5479/si.9781935623069.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Cooperation and Management of Tourism: A World within a World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In situ resource utilization (ISRU) has not yet been a viable approach for providing needed resources for the bases in Antarctica (e.g., fuel for transport and electrical power). 26 In addition, commercial interest in drilling and exploration for mineral resources on the continent resulted in rejection of CRAMRA and a subsequent moratorium on drilling except for science exploration (see The Antarctic Treaty System section). As Earth's population continues to grow, and as more countries' economies develop, there will be undoubtedly increased demand for access to natural resources worldwide, which may in turn produce fundamental shifts in perspectives about the use of Antarctica resources and surrounding areas.…”
Section: Responsible Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In situ resource utilization (ISRU) has not yet been a viable approach for providing needed resources for the bases in Antarctica (e.g., fuel for transport and electrical power). 26 In addition, commercial interest in drilling and exploration for mineral resources on the continent resulted in rejection of CRAMRA and a subsequent moratorium on drilling except for science exploration (see The Antarctic Treaty System section). As Earth's population continues to grow, and as more countries' economies develop, there will be undoubtedly increased demand for access to natural resources worldwide, which may in turn produce fundamental shifts in perspectives about the use of Antarctica resources and surrounding areas.…”
Section: Responsible Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the growing interest in tourism and the changing nature of the tourism industry, questions have arisen over the advisability of continued industry-based oversight of its own activities, and whether Antarctic Treaty parties, national governments, or other regulatory bodies may be needed in the future to resolve concerns about the increasing number of incidents and problems linked with the tourism industry. 26 Likewise, the ATS has had to deal with questions about access to and use of its physical resources. In situ resource utilization (ISRU) has not yet been a viable approach for providing needed resources for the bases in Antarctica (e.g., fuel for transport and electrical power).…”
Section: Responsible Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IAATO has no authority to impose legal restrictions or limit companies' operations, and relies on market authority and social pressure (Landau, 2011). Meetings are held throughout the year and are the glue that binds members and maintains commitment levels.…”
Section: Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now that tourism has grown much larger, ATCPs experience difficulty actively managing tourism as many countries are involved and no single governing body decides on tourism issues (e.g. Landau, 2011;Molenaar, 2005;Splettstoesser, Landau, & Headland, 2004). The most important tool ATCPs have achieved for regulating Antarctic tourism is the 1991 Madrid Protocol on Environmental Protection, which was ratified in 1998 (Bastmeijer & Lamers, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%