2018
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Effects of Euro Area Versus U.S. Policy Uncertainty: A Favar Approach

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(139 reference statements)
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these estimates, the countryspecific uncertainty shocks get transmitted to the other economies and have negative e↵ects qualitatively similar to those of the global uncertainty shocks. This pattern is broadly similar to that of Caggiano, Castelnuovo and, Figueres (2019) and Belke and Osowski (2019) for the case of U.S. economic policy uncertainty shocks. These robustness results are consistent with our main findings of strong commonality in uncertainty that a↵ects all major economies considered.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these estimates, the countryspecific uncertainty shocks get transmitted to the other economies and have negative e↵ects qualitatively similar to those of the global uncertainty shocks. This pattern is broadly similar to that of Caggiano, Castelnuovo and, Figueres (2019) and Belke and Osowski (2019) for the case of U.S. economic policy uncertainty shocks. These robustness results are consistent with our main findings of strong commonality in uncertainty that a↵ects all major economies considered.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Their interpretation of the results is that higher U.S. policy uncertainty leads to higher uncertainty in Canada and the U.K., and this in turn a↵ects economic activity. Belke and Osowski (2019) compare the transmission of U.S. and E.A. policy uncertainty using a large-scale FAVAR model with data for 18 OECD countries.…”
Section: Relationship To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their interpretation of the results is that higher US policy uncertainty leads to higher uncertainty in Canada and the UK, and this in turn affects economic activity. Belke and Osowski () compare the transmission of US and EA policy uncertainty using a large‐scale factor‐augmented vector autoregression (FAVAR) model with data for 18 OECD countries. Their results are broadly in line with those of Caggiano, Castelnuovo, and Figueres(), in the sense that the effects of both US and EA uncertainty shocks are generally negative on all countries, with stronger effects for the former than for the latter, and with uncertainty shocks originating in one country quickly increasing uncertainty in the other countries.…”
Section: Relationship To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find the contribution of global uncertainty shocks to the dynamics of inflation and output growth in these countries to be significantly larger than that of idiosyncratic disturbances to uncertainty. Belke and Osowski () estimate a large‐scale factor‐augmented vector autoregressive model for 18 OECD countries. They find evidence in favour of sizeable cross‐border effects related to EPU shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%