2019
DOI: 10.1111/roie.12458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International emissions trading in a political economy

Abstract: We examine whether the international emissions trading (IET) scheme can reduce global emissions in a political economy framework. Countries act noncooperatively when choosing the tradable emission permits and the environmental tax. The formulation of environmental policies is influenced by interest groups. Our results show that the effect of IET on global emissions depends crucially on which policies are influenced by lobbying activities. In the case where only environmental taxes are influenced by lobbying, I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the direct e ect leads to a policy change in the desired direction in the own country, there is an indirect e ect in the opposite direction on the government of the other country (because of the strategic substitutability of emission permit choices), which may outweigh the direct e ect. Cheng and Chu (2020) also analyze the in uence of lobbying on the performance of an international emission permit market, yet they assume that polluting rms are subject to both an international permit market regime and, in addition, a domestic emission tax. 16 In contrast to Habla and Winkler (2013) they take the formation of an international emission permit market as given and concentrate on the in uence of lobbying on domestic and global emissions.…”
Section: Hierarchical Interplay Between Domestic Political Pressure and International Climate Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the direct e ect leads to a policy change in the desired direction in the own country, there is an indirect e ect in the opposite direction on the government of the other country (because of the strategic substitutability of emission permit choices), which may outweigh the direct e ect. Cheng and Chu (2020) also analyze the in uence of lobbying on the performance of an international emission permit market, yet they assume that polluting rms are subject to both an international permit market regime and, in addition, a domestic emission tax. 16 In contrast to Habla and Winkler (2013) they take the formation of an international emission permit market as given and concentrate on the in uence of lobbying on domestic and global emissions.…”
Section: Hierarchical Interplay Between Domestic Political Pressure and International Climate Policymentioning
confidence: 99%