2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
257
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
15
257
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 197 Au(n,γ ) cross section is an established cross-section standard for thermal neutron energies (at 0.0253 eV) and for the energy range between 0.2 and 2.8 MeV [1]. The evaluation of the standard cross section is based on available experimental data, including absolute measurements and information from relative measurements and from measurements of cross-section ratios.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 197 Au(n,γ ) cross section is an established cross-section standard for thermal neutron energies (at 0.0253 eV) and for the energy range between 0.2 and 2.8 MeV [1]. The evaluation of the standard cross section is based on available experimental data, including absolute measurements and information from relative measurements and from measurements of cross-section ratios.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 241 Am(n, f ) cross-section has been extracted relative to the 235 U(n, f ) cross-section, which is an established standard in the neutron energy range from 150 keV to 200 MeV [25]. Compared to a direct measurement, the ratio method has the advantage that systematic uncertainties are strongly reduced, especially with respect to the determination of the neutron flux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yields were corrected for neutron attenuation and multiple scattering in the sample using Monte Carlo methods. Absolute normalization of the cross sections were determined by measuring n-p scattering [2,3]. Representative (n,n) angular distributions are shown in Sec.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%