International harmonization of training and qualification in the manufacturing industry

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to propose a model for international harmonization of the training and qualification of human resources for industrial professions. The outcome is a system based on training guidelines and a quality assurance methodology that is now in use in 42 countries around the world.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes the motivations that led to the development of the International System for the Training and Qualification of Welding Personnel. The structure of this system and the documents on which it is based are outlined.FindingsThe approach used has gained wide international acceptance. The progress achieved is analysed in the final part of the paper. More than 150,000 qualifications have so far been awarded around the world.Practical implicationsThe need for a harmonized International System for the Training and Qualification of Welding Personnel has been recognized by industry and the authorities. The reference to this system in international standards and the general recognition of its reliability by stake holders is leading to its widespread use in more countries and by more professionals.Originality/valueThe harmonized international system for the qualification of human resources in welding technology is unique in Europe. The methodology used has proved to be successful and can be benchmarked for application in human resources development for other professions.

European harmonised system for training and qualification of adhesive bonding personnel

“…For nearly 30 years, these organizations have been developing guidance documents and technology exchange mechanisms to support companies seeking to adopt best practice in joining. This has been a monumental effort, culminating in the installation of unique and comprehensive training, qualification and certification systems, applied to both people and companies, harmonized on a world-wide basis [5].…”

Achieving harmonized port security training in Europe–a critical review of EU legislative frameworks

“…More specific gaps that our team could spot are summarized in Table 1 Design of EU common courses The ISPS code indicates clearly a total set of 34 subjects or topics that are of interest for port personnel. Hence, it may be stated that these topics correspond well to subjects or modules required to develop a course syllabus, as suggested in Quintino et al (2011). However, the lack of objectives, scopes, and expected results, stated at the EU level, generate much uncertainty about the real content that trainers are supposed to develop.…”

“…To overcome this challenge it was decided to develop a qualification and certification system that could enable mutual recognition of courses and certificates in the EU. More specifically, three main steps may be identified (Quintino et al 2011…”

“…The main vision of lifelong learning concerns placing learning activities at the heart of economic development. This implies that adult learning must follow worldwide developments and ensure that individuals are updated about all recent advances achieved within their professions (Quintino et al 2011). This concept praises the commitment of individuals to become lifelong learners, i.e.…”

“…Other research not focusing on supply chain or transport security has already studied the benefits of training and education in organizations (Senge 2006). In particular, relevant studies have been performed to show how to ensure that all relevant personnel in an organization may achieve the same level of ability, skills, and quality of performance (Quintino et al 2011). Yet, we could not find any study that specifically analyses the problem of security training in port facilities.…”