International organisations and the future of work: How new technologies and inequality shaped the narratives in 2019

Abstract

In a critical review of seven prominent flagship reports from five international organisations – the International Labour Organization (ILO), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and World Bank – this article explores how the policy narratives set out during 2019 and early 2020 have characterised the major future of work challenges associated with new technologies and inequality. It identifies some similarities in viewpoints, including about the unevenness of job changes caused by new technologies and about the declining labour income share, a key measure of inequality. However, there are major points of differentiation. The ILO, OECD and UNDP express serious concerns about the interaction between new technologies and growing inequalities, on the one hand, and a rise in precarious work, concentration of corporate power and erosion of labour bargaining power on the other. Also, UNIDO emphasises the inequalities in technological capacities between developed and developing countries, which make it difficult for markets to distribute the gains from growth evenly. While the World Bank makes some concessions, it remains less open to real-world heterodox evidence about how labour markets function in society. The World Bank aside, there is a growing consensus that labour institutions around the world need to be reinvigorated in order to respond to the challenges facing the future of work.

Improving Personnel Management by Organizational Projects: Implications for Open Innovation

“…In this regard, the authors assumed that the economic and financial assessment of projects aimed at the development of personnel management systems can be based on the general methodology for the commercial assessment of projects, which is presented in the so-called UNIDO methodology [55], and is the basis for numerous banking and other methods of assessing the effectiveness of projects operating in the Russian Federation and other countries.…”

Work–life balance and gig work: ‘Where are we now’ and ‘where to next’ with the work–life balance agenda?

“…Here, then, we again review findings from studies on gig work through our work-life balance lens to consider the implications for workplace gender equality. Crucially for work-life balance, rather than more temporal freedom for workers, gig work brings new and more extreme forms of control of their work-time (see Grimshaw, 2020), especially via apps. Ellmer et al (2019) discuss how Upwork, for example, monitors workers via a 'Freelancers Work Diary': the app takes screenshots of freelancers' screens at 10 minute intervals, keeping a detailed log of their work-time and job progress.…”

“…Turning to worker voice and gig work, the nature of gig work does make collective bargaining difficult (Grimshaw, 2020). Many trades unions have learned to organise outside so-called standard work norms in order to address issues of equality, diversity and inclusion, with e.g.…”

Australian industrial relations in 2019: The year wage theft went mainstream

“…Finally, Damian Grimshaw’s (2020) international review article examines the responses of international organisations to ‘future of work’ challenges presented by new technologies and inequality. He compares and contrasts seven flagship reports from five international organisations: the International Labor Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, the United Nations Development Programme and the World Bank.…”