2005
DOI: 10.1097/00130478-200501000-00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference: Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction in Pediatrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
573
0
34

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(612 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
573
0
34
Order By: Relevance
“…The considerable heterogeneity regarding the definition of neonatal sepsis observed among the studies included in our review illustrates the lack of a universally acceptable definition of neonatal sepsis, particularly for the clinically septic but culture-negative newborns [9]. Although in neonatology the concept of clinical sepsis is widely used and considerable attempts have been made [24], a uniform definition for this common diagnosis is still lacking. This can be a cause of variability in the criteria for the definition of neonatal sepsis used in the studies that evaluate clinically diagnosed sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The considerable heterogeneity regarding the definition of neonatal sepsis observed among the studies included in our review illustrates the lack of a universally acceptable definition of neonatal sepsis, particularly for the clinically septic but culture-negative newborns [9]. Although in neonatology the concept of clinical sepsis is widely used and considerable attempts have been made [24], a uniform definition for this common diagnosis is still lacking. This can be a cause of variability in the criteria for the definition of neonatal sepsis used in the studies that evaluate clinically diagnosed sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If healthy neonates were included in the non-septic group, the study population was considered as non-representative. The acceptable reference standard consisted of diagnostic criteria for neonatal sepsis matching those presented in the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus conference [24]. Partial and differential verification biases were considered to have been avoided if all the included children were evaluated with the same reference standard method used in each study, regardless of the PCT results.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…milrinone (lg/kg/min) 9 10. Non-pulmonary organ failures at time of PARDS diagnosis were identified using standard definitions for children [24]. The designation of ''immunocompromised'' required presence of an immunocompromising diagnosis (oncologic, immunologic, rheumatologic, or transplant) and active immunosuppressive chemotherapy, or a congenital immunodeficiency [25,26].…”
Section: Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test associations in more homogenous subgroups, we assessed the association between corticosteroid exposure [24 h and outcome in immunocompetent children, in patients with PARDS resulting from a pulmonary or non-pulmonary infection requiring vasopressor support (and therefore meeting criteria for septic shock [24]), and in children with reactive airway disease or lung disease of prematurity (Supplementary Table 4). In no subgroup was benefit seen with corticosteroids.…”
Section: Subgroup Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular, neurologic, haematologic, renal and hepatic failure were defined according to organ dysfunction criteria of the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus [20].…”
Section: Candidate Prognostic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%