International Representation in US Social-Science Journals

Abstract

In this paper we examine the publication of international articles in the two leading journals in sociology, the American Sociological Review and the American Journal of Sociology. The most prominent journals in several other social-science fields, namely economics, demography, political science and education, are included for purposes of comparison. "International" is defined alternatively with respect to topics and authors. The journal with the least representation of international topics is the American Educational Research Journal, followed by the two leading sociology journals. The journal Demography is also more international in focus than are ASR and AJS. Economics, as represented by the American Economic Review, and political science, as represented by the American Political Science Review, are the most international of this set of fields. The rank order of journals follows largely the same pattern when the focus shifts to international authorship rather than international subject matter. Foreign first authors are not uncommon, but many of these authors received their PhD degrees from a university based in the US or held a faculty position in the US. Co-authorship teams are most likely to be all US authors, but cross-national teams are not at all uncommon. Our findings suggest that a disproportionate focus on the U.S. may limit the sociological imagination and result in an impoverished sociological toolkit that is ill-suited for understanding the global reality of deeply diverse and divided societies. In addition, the opportunity structure available to sociologists around the globe is somewhat skewed. Foreign sociologists who rely upon publication in US journals for career advancement may find themselves at a disadvantage.

Is Anti-Immigrant Sentiment Owned by the Political Right?

“…Scholars have repeatedly shown that knowledge, concepts and instruments produced in North America and Western Europe benefit from the dominant position in the social sciences (Beigel, 2014; Jacobs and Mizrachi, 2020; Krause, 2016). In the case of postsocialist societies in Central and Eastern Europe, this dominance is reinforced by both the legacy of the Cold War and the internal hierarchies of Europe, which have consistently construed Eastern Europe as subordinate and inferior to Western Europe (Koobak and Marling, 2014; Krivonos and Näre, 2019).…”

Debates on Global Sociology: ‘Unity and Diversity’ of Interpretations

“…Connell, 2007; see also Sklair, 2013). But while empirical tests of the globalization of different aspect of publishing formats in sociology have seen the light of day (Beigel, 2014;Collyer, 2018;Jacobs & Mizrachi, 2020;Koch et al, 2020;Koch & Vanderstraeten, 2019;Vanderstraeten & Eykens, 2018), hitherto systematic sociological-historical reflections on the particulars of the debate on global sociology do not exist (see also Abbott, 2020). 1 The official histories of these associations focus for the largest part on their aims and social structures, not on the roles they actually play in the internationalization processes (see Platt, 1998;Rhoades, 1981;Schuerkens, 1996).…”

American Medical Sociology and Health Problems in the Global South

“…Even if incomplete, such an evidence base helps us to see where the gaps are. Finally, as other recent work has noted, the exclusion of international research from top journals may not only have deleterious effects on the discipline, but also on the career prospects of researchers who engage in international work (Jacobs and Mizrachi 2020). An understanding of the mechanisms that produce and enable epistemic parochialism therefore offers journal editors, funding and educational institutions, and researchers the tools to change the status quo and incorporate more diverse perspectives into the process of scientific knowledge production.…”