International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines

Abstract

Several stakeholders in the field of biobank research are currently developing and evaluating innovative consent procedures, and in doing so refer to national and international guidelines that regulate biomedical research. The objectives of this study were to present (1) a synthesis of all consent issues mentioned or required in guidelines that are of potential relevance to biobank research and (2) a detailed overview of similarities and differences between these guidelines. This analysis considered a purposive sample of the nine most internationally recognised research guidelines plus a national checklist for developing consent forms. The synthesis of all included research guidelines found 41 issues of potential relevance to consent procedures in biobank research. The guidelines differ substantially with respect to (1) how comprehensively they address these consent issues, (2) their definition and explanation of the issues and (3) how directly or indirectly the issues are mentioned. The set of 41 consent issues presented in this paper should be further developed in a continuous process. Our findings on the differences among major research guidelines also raise the issue of a more systematic development and revision process for these guidelines. The presented set of content issues potentially relevant to consent in biobank research can inform the balanced development or evaluation of consent forms, as well as the development and revision of corresponding research guidelines.

Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens

“…Actual practice varies, as collections of biospecimens (or biobanks) are highly heterogeneous in terms of tissue type, procurement situation, and geographic, social, and historical context ( 56 , 58 , 60 , 126 , 146 ). Furthermore, regulations and guidelines concerning informed consent are not necessarily specific to biospecimen research, nor are they harmonized ( 40 , 59 ). As illustrated by current US regulations, the result has sometimes been ambiguity, inadvertent constraints on research access, and research proceeding without consent ( 40 , 47 , 69 ).…”

Practice evaluation of biobank ethics and governance: current needs and future perspectives

“…The authors highlighted examples of good practice; for instance, they favoured dynamic consent models, which allow donors to narrow the broad consent according to individual preferences. In two studies, Hirschberg et al first synthesised the spectrum of relevant issues for biobank consent from international research guidelines 19. In sum, 41 distinct consent issues in four broader thematic categories could be distilled (general information, conditions of participation, consequences of participation and dealing with data and biomaterial).…”

What Do Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiology Say About an Ethics Review? A Qualitative Systematic Review

“…All authors’ background is philosophy and bioethics, particularly research ethics. In bioethics similar approaches have been already described in the literature (Hirschberg et al 2014; Strech et al 2013; Henderson et al 2013). …”