1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02093972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International scientific co-operation and awareness within the European community: Problems and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of noticeable dispersion, the general tendency can be observed: higher index values are related to higher chemometric Table V. activity. This fact may be related with earlier observations [66][67][68] that national scientific efforts are well correlated with scientific production.…”
Section: Chemometrics-development Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In spite of noticeable dispersion, the general tendency can be observed: higher index values are related to higher chemometric Table V. activity. This fact may be related with earlier observations [66][67][68] that national scientific efforts are well correlated with scientific production.…”
Section: Chemometrics-development Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Prominent among these has been the growing integration of Western Europe in the years up to 1992 and the increasing role played by the European Commission in supporting research [43,47]. Furthermore, just as collaboration between European scientists after the Second World War in organisations like CERN, the European Southern Observatory (ESO) and the European Molecular Biology Organisation (EMBO) was seen as one way of building stronger links between nations, so the recent political changes in Eastern Europe have resulted in calls for Western scientists to collaborate with their colleagues in the East to help bring about stronger political and cultural ties.…”
Section: What Motivates Collaboration?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, when interest emerged in the phenomenon of international collaboration [5,15,31,33,34,43,44,46,47,50,55 ], it was sometimes assumed that it could simply be equated with papers listing addresses in two (or more) countries. Similarly, studies of inter-institutional collaboration generally take as their starting point the belief that this can be measured by examining papers listing two (or more) institutional addresses.…”
Section: How Can One Measure Collaboration? the Distinction Between Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The year 1990 was witness to a number of conferences and studies centered on collaboration, [38][39][40] and visual displays of networks of collaboration began to proliferate. The vast majority of the co-authorship networks (at different levels of aggregation) attempt to depict the density of connections among the aggregate members.…”
Section: Previous Research On Scientific Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%