International Sentencing

Holá, Barbora

doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_577

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…the topos of the settings that shun a paradigm of justice based on reciprocity and divided into two different profiles. The first seems to be that on a psychological level the victims of serious crimes expect effective revenge in the sense that only retaliation appears as a means of harm and an adequate measure to restore the violated justice (Danner, 2001;Beresford, 2001;Hole, 2005;Harmon, Gaynor, 2007;Hale, 2007;Mujuzi, 2010;Margetts, Kappos, 2012;Nowak, 2013;Zakerian, Alikhani, 2013;Hola, 2014;Doherty, Steinberg, 2016;Fernàndez-Pacheco Estrada, 2017;Jarvis, 2017;Aliňàn, Ollè Sesè, 2018) 25 . From this point of view, a rational penal intervention is not oriented towards satisfying desires, feelings or emotional drives but assumes the real interests of the victims and certainly does not give the exclusive and legitimate answer 25 See ex multis: ICTY, Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, Trial Judgment, IT-95-14/1-T, 25 June 1999, par.…”

Section: Towards a "Victim Conscious Retributivism"mentioning

confidence: 99%

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Liakopoulos¹

2023

YIECPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International criminal law constitutes, due to its intrinsic characteristics, a competition challenge at the universal level of norms and crimes which finds its most natural and logical manifestation through the final penalties provided for in the Statute of the International Criminal Court (StICC). The present work has as its object to analyze the punishment according to the StICC, the hypotheses of normative convergences that are established alongside the foreseen sentences, the jurisprudential cases, the verifiable convergences within the global international community where the sentences take place over the years, the path of harmonization, integration, evolution, development not so much of international criminal law but also of domestic law, the rationalization of accounts with internal justice which is never eliminated by the international one, snubbed towards a type of annihilating a priori inevitable phenomena against the impunity, the continuous violence against human rights and the strength of the victors and hegemons.

show abstract

Section: Towards a "Victim Conscious Retributivism"mentioning

confidence: 99%

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Liakopoulos¹

2023

YIECPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

International Sentencing

Cited by 1 publication

References 20 publications

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About