International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment

Abstract

Purpose: Rectal cancer treatment has a wide range of possible approaches from radical extirpative surgery to nonoperative watchful waiting following chemoradiotherapy, with or without, additional chemotherapy. Our goal was to assess the personal opinion of active practicing surgeons on rectal cancer treatment if he/she was the patient. Methods: A panel of the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 10 questions that were included in a questionnaire that included other items including demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in our database and remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. Results: One hundred sixty-three specialists completed the survey. The majority of surgeons (n = 65, 39.9%) chose the minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery for their personal treatment of rectal cancer. For low-lying rectal cancer T1 and T2, the treatment choice was standard chemoradiation+local excision (n = 60, 36.8%) followed by local excision ± chemoradiotherapy if needed (n = 55, 33.7%). In regards to locally advanced low rectal cancer T3 or greater, the preference of the responders was for laparoscopic surgery (n = 65, 39.9%). We found a statistically significant relationship between surgeons' age and their preference for minimally invasive techniques demonstrating an age-based bias on senior surgeons' inclination toward open approach. Conclusion: Our survey reveals an age-based preference by surgeons for minimally invasive surgical techniques as well as organ-preserving techniques for personal treatment of treating rectal cancer. Only 1/4 of specialists do adhere to the international guidelines for treating early rectal cancer.

Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes

“…However, some investigators argue that there is still insufficient evidence to enforce WW strategy. It also tends to be reluctant to surgeons yet [ 97 ].…”

Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review

“…Despite advancements in treatment and implementation of a nationwide screening program, the mortality rate has steadily increased [ 2 ]. The current status of treatment of patients with rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary strategy encompassing local excision, total mesorectal excision (TME), chemotherapy, and radiotherapy [ 3 ]. For patients with early rectal cancer, local excision is an optional treatment within the spectrum of organ-preserving strategies [ 4 , 5 ].…”