2016
DOI: 10.17816/ptors4267-72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (ASIA/ISNCSCI scale, revised 2015) 67

Abstract: Standardization of neurological examination and diagnosis in the case of spinal injury is currently an important challenge in neurotraumatology. At present, most organizations, worldwide, that are involved with spinal injuries, apply the International Standards for Neurological Classifications of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), drafted by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and approved in 1992. The ASIA/ISNCSCI scale is a quantitative system for estimation of the neurological status of spinal cord injury … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nas lesões traumáticas de medular espinhal, o exame neurológico se faz extremamente importante para avaliar a gravidade e o nível da lesão; a escala de Frankel apresenta cinco categorias de avaliação; motora, sensitiva e alteração dos reflexos, sendo redefinida em um padrão mais completo pela American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) um sistema quantitativo para estimar o estado neurológico dos pacientes com lesão da medula espinhal (VISSARIONOV et al, 2016;VAN MIDDENDORP et al, 2011). A escala de ASIA avalia a função motora e sensorial, através de exames em pontos e níveis de dermátomos específicos, classificando de acordo com o grau da lesão EK incompleta ou completa, além dos níveis de lesão, paraplegia ou tetraplegia (SILVA et al, 2011;JOBST et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Nas lesões traumáticas de medular espinhal, o exame neurológico se faz extremamente importante para avaliar a gravidade e o nível da lesão; a escala de Frankel apresenta cinco categorias de avaliação; motora, sensitiva e alteração dos reflexos, sendo redefinida em um padrão mais completo pela American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) um sistema quantitativo para estimar o estado neurológico dos pacientes com lesão da medula espinhal (VISSARIONOV et al, 2016;VAN MIDDENDORP et al, 2011). A escala de ASIA avalia a função motora e sensorial, através de exames em pontos e níveis de dermátomos específicos, classificando de acordo com o grau da lesão EK incompleta ou completa, além dos níveis de lesão, paraplegia ou tetraplegia (SILVA et al, 2011;JOBST et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…For the treatment of decubital trophic ulcers, bioplastic material based on native type I collagen is used (the choice is "Kollost"). 32,33 To judge the dynamics of wound healing, a photographic wound assessment tool 34 can be used in the wound assessment battery.…”
Section: ) Treatment Of Complications Of Sci In the Recovery And Latmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the level of spinal cord injury is estimated according to the AIS scale which goes from A (complete injury) to E (normal). 4 Using this classification system, a prognosis for neurological recovery and ambulation can be predicted. A patient with complete spinal cord injury (ASIA grade A) has the lowest chance of being able to walk independently after 1 year, while an incomplete injury (ASIA grade B to D) have a higher chance for recovery.…”
Section: Follow-up and Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Under this system, motor function is assessed by 10 key muscles while sensory function is assessed by pin-prick and fine touch sensation with classification as grade A (complete spinal cord injury) to grade E (normal spinal cord). 4 Although a direct association between AIS and neurological outcome has been observed, 5 sensory function consists of mechanoreceptor, proprioceptor, temperature receptor and nociceptor modalities. Omission of any one of these modalities could affect the reliability of the AIS scoring system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%