2017
DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2017.1405244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International student migration: a comparison of UK and Indian students’ motivations for studying abroad

Abstract: This paper breaks new ground in its comparative analysis of two international student migration (ISM) streams, one from the Global South to the Global North (India to developed Anglophone countries), and the other within the Global North (UK to North America, Europe and Australia). These two ISM movements reflect different positionalities within the global system of international student movements, and hence necessitate a critical perspective on the assumptions behind such a comparison, which questions the dom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach could include biographical research (see Roberts [2002] for more information), be multi-sited (such as the LANGSNAP project [2013]), and follow the students back home to continue post-SA research. King & Raghuram (2013) also invite researchers to delve into the available survey data and other datasets and carry out statistical analyses, improve theorization of student mobility (e.g., Coleman 2013bColeman , 2015Xiao & Wray 2016), and include gendered analysis to explain the dynamics of SA experiences (e.g., Trentman 2015; King & Sondhi 2016). Jensen & Howard (2014: 32) highlight that 'while SA has proven to be highly beneficial in certain areas, such as fluency, sociolinguistic competence and lexical development, it appears to have a less positive effect on grammatical development compared to the classroom setting.'…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach could include biographical research (see Roberts [2002] for more information), be multi-sited (such as the LANGSNAP project [2013]), and follow the students back home to continue post-SA research. King & Raghuram (2013) also invite researchers to delve into the available survey data and other datasets and carry out statistical analyses, improve theorization of student mobility (e.g., Coleman 2013bColeman , 2015Xiao & Wray 2016), and include gendered analysis to explain the dynamics of SA experiences (e.g., Trentman 2015; King & Sondhi 2016). Jensen & Howard (2014: 32) highlight that 'while SA has proven to be highly beneficial in certain areas, such as fluency, sociolinguistic competence and lexical development, it appears to have a less positive effect on grammatical development compared to the classroom setting.'…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Böttcher et al 2016;Ramos 2009). Moreover, they suggest that female students tend to pursue international student mobility as a way of escaping highly patriarchal societies (Brooks and Waters 2011;King and Sondhi 2016). Last, to our knowledge, there is not comprehensive analysis on race inequality and international student mobility.…”
Section: Research On International Student Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With this in mind, it is not surprising that the last 5 years has seen a particular expansion of the field (e.g. Beech 2015; Prazeres 2017; King and Sondhi 2018;Yang 2018). That being said, it is still a relatively peripheral subject, at least within most social scientific disciplines.…”
Section: The Presentation Of Purpose In Educational Sojournsmentioning
confidence: 99%