Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ObjectiveAlthough traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common, there are no prospective models quantifying individual epilepsy risk after moderate‐to‐severe TBI (msTBI). We generated parsimonious prediction models to quantify individual epilepsy risk between acute inpatient rehabilitation for individuals 2 years after msTBI.MethodsWe used data from 6089 prospectively enrolled participants (≥16 years) in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Of these, 4126 individuals had complete seizure data collected over a 2‐year period post‐injury. We performed a case‐complete analysis to generate multiple prediction models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Baseline predictors were used to assess 2‐year seizure risk (Model 1). Then a 2‐year seizure risk was assessed excluding the acute care variables (Model 2). In addition, we generated prognostic models predicting new/recurrent seizures during Year 2 post‐msTBI (Model 3) and predicting new seizures only during Year 2 (Model 4). We assessed model sensitivity when keeping specificity ≥.60, area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and AUROC model performance through 5‐fold cross‐validation (CV).ResultsModel 1 (73.8% men, 44.1 ± 19.7 years, 76.1% moderate TBI) had a model sensitivity = 76.00% and average AUROC = .73 ± .02 in 5‐fold CV. Model 2 had a model sensitivity = 72.16% and average AUROC = .70 ± .02 in 5‐fold CV. Model 3 had a sensitivity = 86.63% and average AUROC = .84 ± .03 in 5‐fold CV. Model 4 had a sensitivity = 73.68% and average AUROC = .67 ± .03 in 5‐fold CV. Cranial surgeries, acute care seizures, intracranial fragments, and traumatic hemorrhages were consistent predictors across all models. Demographic and mental health variables contributed to some models. Simulated, clinical examples model individual PTE predictions.SignificanceUsing information available, acute‐care, and year‐1 post‐injury data, parsimonious quantitative epilepsy prediction models following msTBI may facilitate timely evidence‐based PTE prognostication within a 2‐year period. We developed interactive web‐based tools for testing prediction model external validity among independent cohorts. Individualized PTE risk may inform clinical trial development/design and clinical decision support tools for this population.
ObjectiveAlthough traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common, there are no prospective models quantifying individual epilepsy risk after moderate‐to‐severe TBI (msTBI). We generated parsimonious prediction models to quantify individual epilepsy risk between acute inpatient rehabilitation for individuals 2 years after msTBI.MethodsWe used data from 6089 prospectively enrolled participants (≥16 years) in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Of these, 4126 individuals had complete seizure data collected over a 2‐year period post‐injury. We performed a case‐complete analysis to generate multiple prediction models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Baseline predictors were used to assess 2‐year seizure risk (Model 1). Then a 2‐year seizure risk was assessed excluding the acute care variables (Model 2). In addition, we generated prognostic models predicting new/recurrent seizures during Year 2 post‐msTBI (Model 3) and predicting new seizures only during Year 2 (Model 4). We assessed model sensitivity when keeping specificity ≥.60, area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and AUROC model performance through 5‐fold cross‐validation (CV).ResultsModel 1 (73.8% men, 44.1 ± 19.7 years, 76.1% moderate TBI) had a model sensitivity = 76.00% and average AUROC = .73 ± .02 in 5‐fold CV. Model 2 had a model sensitivity = 72.16% and average AUROC = .70 ± .02 in 5‐fold CV. Model 3 had a sensitivity = 86.63% and average AUROC = .84 ± .03 in 5‐fold CV. Model 4 had a sensitivity = 73.68% and average AUROC = .67 ± .03 in 5‐fold CV. Cranial surgeries, acute care seizures, intracranial fragments, and traumatic hemorrhages were consistent predictors across all models. Demographic and mental health variables contributed to some models. Simulated, clinical examples model individual PTE predictions.SignificanceUsing information available, acute‐care, and year‐1 post‐injury data, parsimonious quantitative epilepsy prediction models following msTBI may facilitate timely evidence‐based PTE prognostication within a 2‐year period. We developed interactive web‐based tools for testing prediction model external validity among independent cohorts. Individualized PTE risk may inform clinical trial development/design and clinical decision support tools for this population.
Background: Post-traumatic seizures and epilepsy are major complications that increase the mortality rate among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hinder functional recovery. It is important to establish prophylaxis and treatment strategies for high-risk patients. The use of antiseizure medications may not only adversely affect the cognitive function following TBI but also may be associated with a worse rehabilitation outcome.Current Concepts: The level of evidence in the current international guidelines related to the prophylaxis and management of post-traumatic seizure is not robust. Furthermore, the use of antiseizure medications after TBI remains unclear, indicating substantial variations in clinical practice.Discussion and Conclusion: Prophylactic antiseizure medications can reduce the risk of early seizures and partially prevent the secondary injury process of TBI; however, they do not seem to inhibit epileptogenesis. Therefore, if the benefits of preventing early seizures outweigh the potential risks associated with antiseizure medication, it is recommended to use them for a short period of about one week after the injury. Then, it is not recommended to continue using them routinely without considering the individual risk of seizure recurrence and potential adverse effects of long-term use. The treatment duration of anticonvulsant in patients with post-traumatic epilepsy should also be determined based on the individual risk of seizure recurrence, and the decision should take into account the opinions of both the patient and the caregiver, while considering not only the potential benefits but also the risks associated with long-term use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.