2001
DOI: 10.1159/000056917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International System for Chromosome Nomenclature of Domestic Bovids (ISCNDB 2000)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cytogenetic comparisons indicate a high level of colinearity between goat and cattle chromosomes, and all 30 goat chromosomes have been ordered according to the International System for Chromosome Nomenclature for Bovids 20 . Based on chromosomal colinearity, we used the two cattle genome assemblies (UMD_3.1 and Btau_4.0) to anchor super-scaffolds to goat chromosomes.…”
Section: A R T I C L E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytogenetic comparisons indicate a high level of colinearity between goat and cattle chromosomes, and all 30 goat chromosomes have been ordered according to the International System for Chromosome Nomenclature for Bovids 20 . Based on chromosomal colinearity, we used the two cattle genome assemblies (UMD_3.1 and Btau_4.0) to anchor super-scaffolds to goat chromosomes.…”
Section: A R T I C L E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air dried microscopic slides were stained with Giemsa and analyzed under a Nikon E600 Eclipse microscope, equipped with a cooled digital CCD camera and computer-aided software LUCIA. International nomenclature of bovine chromosomes (Cribiu et al 2001) was applied to analyze a karyotype of the studied case.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following methodological steps were carried out according to Moorheard et al (1960) using 20 min of hypotonic treatment (0.075 M KCl). A mean number of 20 metaphases were analyzed per individual and the best spreads were photographed using an Olympus BX51 photomicroscope for karyotyping according to Cribiu et al (2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%