Internationalisation and Consolidation of the Container Port Industry: Assessment of Channel Structure and Relationships

Abstract

The international consolidation of the container port industry is a relatively recent, yet radical trend in international shipping and logistics. Global strategies of vertical and horizontal integration evolving around port ownership and operations are undertaken by a variety of market players, both within and outside the international shipping and logistics markets. However, while much of the available literature on the subject has focused on the bases and various motives behind the change, little work has addressed the impacts on channel structure and relationships, including such aspects as control, power and conflict. By channel, we refer to an organised network of institutions that form the combined physical and non-physical path taken by goods and services as they move from original supplier to final consumer. However, in the context of this paper, the scope of the distribution channel is reduced to active members of the international shipping and logistics industry, that is, shippers, ocean carriers, ports, agents and intermediaries. This paper investigates the extent of channel power, conflict, role, performance and strategic concentration of shipping lines as international container terminal operators. A structural equations model is used to assess the impacts of global factors and consolidation on the container port industry, and test whether the direction of change would result in an increasing or decreasing risk of commoditisation and footloose mobility. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2007) 9, 35–51. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100170

Logistics and Supply Chain Management Applications Within a Global Context: An Overview

“…Maritime Economics & Logistics (MEL) followed in rank three with a total of 38 manuscripts. Over half of the articles related to some aspect of maritime port logistics, management, performance or selection (Bichou and Bell 2007;Ugboma, Ugboma, and Ogwude 2006;Van Niekerk 2005). Noteworthy for our review is the publication of a special issue focusing on maritime logistics and global supply chains (Panayides 2006).…”

Getting the work done: motivation needs and processes for seafarers and dock workers

“…The internationalization in the cargo handling industry (Notteboom 2002;Bichou and Bell 2007;Olivier et al 2007;Notteboom and Rodrigue 2012) led to an increasing standardization of terminal equipment around the world. Still, productivity rates per container crane per shift differ across terminals given differences in motivation level and efficiency of dock worker gangs.…”

A game theoretical approach to competition between multi-user terminals: the impact of dedicated terminals

“…Studies on container terminal competition have deployed a variety of methods ranging from quantitative techniques and more descriptive methods. The quantitative methods employed include integer linear programming [17], dynamic programming [18], analytical hierarchy process [19], logit model [20], structural equation model [5], cointegration test and error correction model [21], transport cost model [22], transport demand model [23], and oligopolistic model [21].…”

“…Since the 1990s, a number of these stevedoring companies expanded their networks globally in search of economies of scale, network economies, cost savings, revenue generation, and a further optimization of the terminal function within logistics networks [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8]. PSA, Hutchison Port Holding, and DP World are among the main PTOs, each operating dozens of multi-user container terminals globally.…”