Internet and Online Information Privacy: An Exploratory Study of Preteens and Early Teens

Chai, Sangmi; Bagchi‐Sen, Sharmistha; Morrell, Carole; Rao, H. Raghav; Upadhyaya, Shuchita

doi:10.1109/tpc.2009.2017985

Cited by 100 publications

(77 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, data breach-related anxiety does not appear to represent an aspect of trait anxiety; it seems more state-or stimulus-based. We would argue that such anxiety can wax and wane depending on the extent to which such data breaches are reported by the media and come to the subject's attention (Chai et al, 2009), which have been increasing (Greenwald et al, 2013;NBC News, 2014, October 10;Yadron, 2014, December 17). What predicts data breach anxiety, if not resting anxiety?…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anxiety about internet hacking: Results from a community sample

Elhai

Hall²

2016

Computers in Human Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anxiety about internet hacking: Results from a community sample

Elhai

Hall²

2016

Computers in Human Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Information disclosure in social network sites has been extensively studied, with studies often highlighting the disconnect between stated privacy goals and information sharing behavior [1,3,8]. Recent work indicates increased awareness of privacy implications of social network site use, as well as increased management of disclosure behaviors [18,24,31].…”

Section: Group Context In Social Network Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Boundary regulation in social media

Stutzman

Hartzog

2012

Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

167

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The management of group context in socially mediating technologies is an important challenge for the design community. To better understand how users manage group context, we explored the practice of multiple profile management in social media. In doing so, we observed creative and opportunistic strategies for group context management. We found that multiple profile maintenance is motivated by four factors: privacy, identity, utility, and propriety. Drawing on these motives, we observe a continuum of boundary regulation behaviors: pseudonymity, practical obscurity, and transparent separation. Based on these findings, we encourage designers of group context management systems to more broadly consider motives and practices of group separations in social media. Group context management systems should be privacy-enhancing, but a singular focus on privacy overlooks a range of other group context management practices.

show abstract

“…More recent research has extended it to the technology-related risk domain to study online privacy intrusion (Meso, Yi Ding, & Shuting Xu, 2013;Milne, Labrecque, & Cromer, 2009;Sangmi, Bagchi-sen, Morrell, Rao, & Upadhyaya, 2009), identity theft (Lai, Li, & Hsieh, 2012), online spying and hacking (Chenoweth, Minch, & Gattiker, 2009) and other, broad I.T. threats (Liang & Xue, 2009;Moser, Bruppacher, & Mosler, 2011).…”

Section: Protection Motivation Theory On Facebook Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

How people protect their privacy on facebook: A cost‐benefit view

Vishwanath

Ngoh

2018

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Realizing the many benefits from Facebook require users to share information reciprocally, which has overtime created trillions of bytes of information online—a treasure trove for cybercriminals. The sole protection for any user are three sets of privacy protections afforded by Facebook: settings that control information privacy (i.e., security of social media accounts and identity information), accessibility privacy or anonymity (i.e., manage who can connect with a user), and those that control expressive privacy (i.e., control who can see a user's posts and tag you). Using these settings, however, involves a trade‐off between making oneself accessible and thereby vulnerable to potential attacks, or enacting stringent protections that could potentially make someone inaccessible thereby reducing the benefits that are accruable through social media. Using two theoretical frameworks, Uses and Gratifications (U&G) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), the research examined how individuals congitvely juxtaposed the cost of maintaining privacy through the use of these settings against the benefits of openness. The application of the U&G framework revealed that social need fulfillment was the single most significant benefit driving privacy management. From the cost standpoint, the PMT framework pointed to perceived severity impacting expressive and information privacy, and perceived susceptability influencing accessibility privacy.

show abstract

Internet and Online Information Privacy: An Exploratory Study of Preteens and Early Teens

Cited by 100 publications

References 56 publications

Anxiety about internet hacking: Results from a community sample

Anxiety about internet hacking: Results from a community sample

Boundary regulation in social media

How people protect their privacy on facebook: A cost‐benefit view

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About