2017
DOI: 10.5815/ijcnis.2017.04.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet of Things: A Review on Technologies, Architecture, Challenges, Applications, Future Trends

Abstract: Abstract-World Wide Web (1990"s) and Mobile Internet (the 2000"s) had consequential corroborated the way how people communicate. However, with evolution in technology, the cataclysm of Internet has stepped into a new phase-Internet of Things. Internet of Things, a prominent paradigm in the field of IT having a nominal intervention of humans allowing diverse things to communicate with each other, anticipate, sight, and perceive surroundings. IoT exploits RFID tags, NFC, sensors, smart bands, and wired or wirel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Telecom operators observe the technical challenges of IoT through systems, tools, devices, and platforms because their availability and integration complexity determines the opportunity to capture a share of the value that is generated by IoT implementation. Based on the literature review, it was found that the most commonly mentioned terms in this sense were related to: (1) ticketing system [201]; (2) monitoring: devices [199,[201][202][203][204]/services [199,201,202,205,206]/tools [207]/systems [11,12,199,201,205,206,[208][209][210]/ data [95,201]/framework [12,201]/solutions [20,205]/networks [211]/process [7]/activity [203,204,207]; (3) tracking technologies [4]/devices [204]/systems [204]/applications [11,210]/system [201]/services [202,205]; (4) [95,199]. This has led us to identify four activities, i.e., ticketing, monitoring, tracking, and managing/controlling, as new classification criteria of IoT applications.…”
Section: Activity-based Classification Of Iot Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Telecom operators observe the technical challenges of IoT through systems, tools, devices, and platforms because their availability and integration complexity determines the opportunity to capture a share of the value that is generated by IoT implementation. Based on the literature review, it was found that the most commonly mentioned terms in this sense were related to: (1) ticketing system [201]; (2) monitoring: devices [199,[201][202][203][204]/services [199,201,202,205,206]/tools [207]/systems [11,12,199,201,205,206,[208][209][210]/ data [95,201]/framework [12,201]/solutions [20,205]/networks [211]/process [7]/activity [203,204,207]; (3) tracking technologies [4]/devices [204]/systems [204]/applications [11,210]/system [201]/services [202,205]; (4) [95,199]. This has led us to identify four activities, i.e., ticketing, monitoring, tracking, and managing/controlling, as new classification criteria of IoT applications.…”
Section: Activity-based Classification Of Iot Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review paper [1,2,10,12, Technical paper [8, Research effectiveness [3][4][5][6][7]9,[11][12][13]29,52, (a) (b) Phase II included the analysis and comparison of papers related to the category of IoT in 5G service classification. Papers were first sorted according to the existing classification criteria of IoT applications in order to underline their deficiencies from telco's perspective.…”
Section: Reference Type Reference Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations