1979
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.42.12.1163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver agreement in assessment of ocular signs in coma.

Abstract: SUMMARY There is interobserver agreement in the assessment of various ocular signs found in coma patients. As measure for observer agreement the parameter kappa (K) was determined for (in-)equality of pupils, reaction of pupils, spontaneous eye movements, and oculocephalic responses. The agreement in the assessment of the pupils to light and in the assessment of (in-)equality of pupils appeared to be satisfactory, but more disagreement occurred in assessing spontaneous eye movements and oculocephalic responses. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pupillary light reflex and size equality of pupils had been shown to have a high interobserver reliability. [17] Therefore, the use of pupillary size and light reflex are indirect measures of dysfunction to pathways subserving consciousness and; thus, important clinical parameters in assessing outcome from traumatic coma. However, effort should be made to exclude direct occulomotor neuropathy before pupillary reactivity or size is considered a prognostic indicator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pupillary light reflex and size equality of pupils had been shown to have a high interobserver reliability. [17] Therefore, the use of pupillary size and light reflex are indirect measures of dysfunction to pathways subserving consciousness and; thus, important clinical parameters in assessing outcome from traumatic coma. However, effort should be made to exclude direct occulomotor neuropathy before pupillary reactivity or size is considered a prognostic indicator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were found by Levy et al [21], who investigated the outcome from hypoxic coma in 210 patients. The most predictive variable at the initial exam ination was the pupillary light reflex, the sign shown to have the least interobserver variability [111,112], None of the 52 patients lacking pupillary reactivity on the initial examination survived with a good outcome or moderate disability. Thereafter, the motor response became the variable having the greatest predictive power.…”
Section: Clinical and Neurological Predictors Of Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of survivors remain comatose and outcome is variable; some may remain in a vegetative state, while others may eventually recover completely [1]. Absent motor response to pain for more than 2 days, absence of corneal and papillary reflexes for more than 24 h, and persistence of a Glasgow Coma Scale score <5 for more than 2–3 days strongly predict death or poor outcome [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. In addition to these clinical signs, a number of neurophysiological and laboratory tests, such as absence of cortical somatosensory evoked potential, CSF creatinine kinase and lactate have been identified as prognostic indicators[10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%