1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70091-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
126
0
15

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
126
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…bladder most descended edge of the bladder, rectum most anteriocaudal point of the anterior rectal wall, PCL pubococcygeal line, MPL mid-pubic line, US horizontal reference line on ultrasonography. Note: left top panel shows the difference of PCL bladder with US bladder vs. the average of these two in centimeters significant, although the interobserver reliability for POP-Q point C and TVL is only moderate (r s =0.52 and 0.49, respectively), as well as the intra-observer reliability for TVL (r s =0.43) [16]. Reliability of MR imaging measurements in women with POP in relation to the reference lines used in this study were described as excellent to good by Fauconnier et al and Broekhuis et al [7,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bladder most descended edge of the bladder, rectum most anteriocaudal point of the anterior rectal wall, PCL pubococcygeal line, MPL mid-pubic line, US horizontal reference line on ultrasonography. Note: left top panel shows the difference of PCL bladder with US bladder vs. the average of these two in centimeters significant, although the interobserver reliability for POP-Q point C and TVL is only moderate (r s =0.52 and 0.49, respectively), as well as the intra-observer reliability for TVL (r s =0.43) [16]. Reliability of MR imaging measurements in women with POP in relation to the reference lines used in this study were described as excellent to good by Fauconnier et al and Broekhuis et al [7,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29] Demographic data and delivery data were collected from the women's electronic medical records and from an electronic questionnaire exploring additional background data. For the purpose of exploring whether route of delivery affected changes in pelvic organ support, the population was subdivided into a vaginal delivery group, including both normal and instrumental vaginal deliveries, and a caesarean delivery group, including both elective as well as acute caesarean deliveries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5 Patients with non-puerperal uterine inversions, prolapsed fibroid polyps and those with complaints but with no demonstrable descent of any pelvic organ following pelvic examination were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any condition that increases pressure in the abdomen and affect the physical load on the pelvic floor or integrity of the muscular and connective tissues of the pelvis increases the likelihood that symptomatic prolapsed will develop. 5 A study of pelvic organ prolapse done in a rural community in southern Ghana shows a prevalence rate of 12.07% 6 however the exact burden of pelvic organ prolapses across the entire country is unknown. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in northern and southern parts of Ghana particularly the urban areas are not expected to be same because of differences in occupational, socio-cultural factors, access and use of health facilities between the two parts of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%