1987
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.2.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interobserver variability in the pathologic interpretation of endomyocardial biopsy results.

Abstract: Controversy exists over the role of endomyocardial biopsy in evaluating patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, particularly in detecting myocarditis and in assessing prognosis. Interobserver variability, if high, could explain conflicting reports. To assess this possibility, we submitted biopsy specimens from 16 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy to seven cardiac pathologists. The same slides were independently reviewed by each and assessed for fibrosis, hypertrophy, nuclear changes on a 0 to 3 + scale, mean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
78
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…First, EMB remains the main tool to diagnose AM, although it presents well-recognized accuracy limits, related to the number and sites of bioptic samples, 23,24 proper timing of the procedure 25 and histopathological interpretation. 26 Consequently, the real incidence of suspected AM without criteria for EMB remains uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, EMB remains the main tool to diagnose AM, although it presents well-recognized accuracy limits, related to the number and sites of bioptic samples, 23,24 proper timing of the procedure 25 and histopathological interpretation. 26 Consequently, the real incidence of suspected AM without criteria for EMB remains uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is underlined by the fact that all tissue samples from the control group were completely virus negative. Previous studies with histologic investigation of myocardial lesions in cases of SIDS based on conventional stainings revealed only unspecific findings (6), and diagnosis often is not reliable because of considerable interobserver variability (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the availability of the Dallas criteria (21), pathologists have yet to agree on what constitutes myocarditis (40). Clearly, several variables are at play and potentially include the infant's age, general health, genetic background (13), underlying immune status, exposure to certain risk factors (41), safety of the sleep environment (Hauck FR 1997 Bedsharing: review of epidemiologic data examining links to SIDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%