2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interoceptive sensitivity facilitates both antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
65
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies reported mean heartbeat detection scores varying between 0.65 and 0.70, e.g., Kever et al (38) reported a mean score of 0.69 (SD = 0.18, range = 0.16–1.00) in more than 400 healthy participants [see also Ref. (3941)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported mean heartbeat detection scores varying between 0.65 and 0.70, e.g., Kever et al (38) reported a mean score of 0.69 (SD = 0.18, range = 0.16–1.00) in more than 400 healthy participants [see also Ref. (3941)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Füstös, Gramann, Herbert, and Pollatos (2012) showed that the more aware a person was of bodily processes (higher interoceptive accuracy), the more successful they were in down-regulating the emotional response to negative affect evoked by emotionally stimulating pictures. Kever, Pollatos, Vermeulen, and Grynberg (2015) found a similar link between interoceptive accuracy and emotion regulation -better detection of bodily signals facilitated the selection and implementation of emotion regulation strategies. Bogaerts, Notebaert, Van Diest, Devriese, De Peuter, and Van den Bergh (2005) found that participants with high negative affectivity have a reduced accuracy in the perception of respiratory symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We used Schandry Mental Tracking Task to assess whether interoceptive accuracy influences the change in ResR, HR and HRV during FCF. As previously mentioned, studies suggest that higher interoceptive accuracy correlates with the ability to down-regulate emotional responses to negative affect (Füstös et al, 2012;Kever et al, 2015). The question is to what extent this down-regulation will be observable in HR, ResR and HRV and if it is possible that participants with higher interoceptive accuracy can, due to suggested down-regulation of negative affect, experience milder physiological response to false cardiac feedback.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Notably, beyond its use as a mere proxy of cognitive control, difficulties in emotion regulation might impact lying in another way, as the engagement in deception might be dependent on one's ability to cope with the emotional states related to lying (e.g., stress) and its consequences (e.g., guilt or shame) (Arndt, Hoglund, & Fujiwara, 2013;Carlson & Wang, 2007). Related to this emotional component of deception, we also included a measure of interoception (the sensitivity to internal signals and bodily states; Garfinkel, Seth, Barrett, Suzuki, & Critchley, 2015;Füstös, Gramann, Herbert, & Pollatos, 2012;Kever, Pollatos, Vermeulen, & Grynberg, 2015), -itself directly involved in cognitive control (Azevedo, Garfinkel, Critchley, & Tsakiris, 2017;Makowski et al, 2019d), to delineate the possible role of sensitivity and regulation of bodily reactions. Critically, due to the inherent nature of the measured construct, we also expect a strong relationship with social desirability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%