2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels of soy protein isolate and sugar beet pectin as a potential carrier for probiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability of probiotics under simulated gastric or intestinal conditions indicated that the freeze-dried or wet beads had less stability under gastric conditions but nearly 90% retention was measured with encapsulated L. casei under sequential simulation of gastric, bile, and intestinal conditions. Storage and simulated gastrointestinal stability after encapsulation of lactic acid bacteria in other polymers or copolymers, such as alginate was highly effective with viability above 8 CFU/g in a mixed probiotic culture [40] While L. casei ATCC 393 cells encapsulated in soy protein isolate-alginate hydrogels had similar stability under storage or simulated gastrointestinal conditions compared to non-encapsulated cells [41] soy protein isolate/sugar beet pectin hydrogels of L. paracasei LS14 showed improved storage and simulated gastrointestinal stability [42] Encapsulated L. plantarum cells in pectin-starch hydrogels were more stable than free cells during storage and simulated gastrointestinal conditions with nearly 7 CFU/g retention [43] Higher stability in pectin-chitosan hydrogels of L. casei were attributed to the basic chitosan layer over pectin, preventing acid infiltration during gastric simulation [44] In the present study, the hydrogel encapsulated L. casei W8 showed good colonic-targeted release potential using only charge modified pectin as the encapsulating agent. The enhanced effectiveness of charge modified pectin is likely due to the formation of numerous, strong junction zones, that immobilize the lactic acid bacteria in are multiple layers of a pectin gel network and prevent diffusion of simulated intestinal fluids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of probiotics under simulated gastric or intestinal conditions indicated that the freeze-dried or wet beads had less stability under gastric conditions but nearly 90% retention was measured with encapsulated L. casei under sequential simulation of gastric, bile, and intestinal conditions. Storage and simulated gastrointestinal stability after encapsulation of lactic acid bacteria in other polymers or copolymers, such as alginate was highly effective with viability above 8 CFU/g in a mixed probiotic culture [40] While L. casei ATCC 393 cells encapsulated in soy protein isolate-alginate hydrogels had similar stability under storage or simulated gastrointestinal conditions compared to non-encapsulated cells [41] soy protein isolate/sugar beet pectin hydrogels of L. paracasei LS14 showed improved storage and simulated gastrointestinal stability [42] Encapsulated L. plantarum cells in pectin-starch hydrogels were more stable than free cells during storage and simulated gastrointestinal conditions with nearly 7 CFU/g retention [43] Higher stability in pectin-chitosan hydrogels of L. casei were attributed to the basic chitosan layer over pectin, preventing acid infiltration during gastric simulation [44] In the present study, the hydrogel encapsulated L. casei W8 showed good colonic-targeted release potential using only charge modified pectin as the encapsulating agent. The enhanced effectiveness of charge modified pectin is likely due to the formation of numerous, strong junction zones, that immobilize the lactic acid bacteria in are multiple layers of a pectin gel network and prevent diffusion of simulated intestinal fluids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because of the -SH group in the cysteine structure that assists the water-holding and absorption capacity (Figure 1B) [45]. Moreover, parameters like protein and polymer concentration, pH, and other hydrophilic functional groups impact the swelling ratio, which can be adjusted based on the application [45,46]. As an instance, Yan et al [46] tuned the swelling ratio of the hydrogel's interpenetrating polymeric network via regulating the concentrations of soy protein isolate and sugar beet pectin.…”
Section: Protein-based Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, parameters like protein and polymer concentration, pH, and other hydrophilic functional groups impact the swelling ratio, which can be adjusted based on the application [45,46]. As an instance, Yan et al [46] tuned the swelling ratio of the hydrogel's interpenetrating polymeric network via regulating the concentrations of soy protein isolate and sugar beet pectin. Within another investigation, Joseph and co-workers [47] concluded that the incorporation of microparticles of fibrin could affect the swelling ratio and adhesion behavior of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-fibrinogen hydrogels.…”
Section: Protein-based Hydrogelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) hydrogels obtained by the enzymatic method were studied by Yan et al [ 57 ] as potential carriers for probiotics. The hydrogels were prepared using a combination of biopolymers, namely soy protein isolate and sugar beet pectin.…”
Section: New Trends In the Drying And Application Of Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%